APA
iyeoche2022
rubric.pdf
Benchmark - Organizational and Personal HR Development Plan - Rubric
Synopsis of Outcomes 7.5 points
Criteria Description
PowerPoint and narrated presentation include a synopsis of the outcomes for
acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the
organization as well as an examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or
processes being used.
5. Target 7.5 points
There is a comprehensive synopsis of the outcomes for acquiring, developing,
training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization. There is a clear
examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.
4. Acceptable 6.53 points
Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human
capital within the organization has adequate detail. There is a clear examination of
the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.
3. Approaching 5.93 points
Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human
capital within the organization has minimal detail. There is a simple examination of
the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.
2. Insufficient 5.55 points
Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human
capital within the organization lacks details. There is a vague examination of the
pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.
Current Strengths of Employees (B) 15 points
Criteria Description
PowerPoint and narrated presentation include explanation of how the company can
focus on the current strengths of employees to leverage diversity to improve
performance outcomes. (C2.2)
5. Target 15 points
There is a thorough explanation of how the company can focus on the current
strengths of employees to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.
Collapse All
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
There is a detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the current
strengths of employees to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.
3. Approaching 11.85 points
There is a minimally detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the
current strengths of employees to leverage diversity to improve performance
outcomes.
2. Insufficient 11.1 points
There is a vague explanation of how the company can focus on the current
strengths of employees to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Proposed Plans 7.5 points
Criteria Description
PowerPoint and narrated presentation include proposed plans for developing and
integrating the different HR positions.
5. Target 7.5 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions, including
how these roles promote Christian worldview principles to create a positive and
accepting workplace culture, are detailed and thorough.
4. Acceptable 6.53 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions, including
how these roles promote Christian worldview principles to create a positive and
accepting workplace culture, are complete and comprehensible.
3. Approaching 5.93 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions, including
how these roles promote Christian worldview principles to create a positive and
accepting workplace culture, are somewhat comprehensible.
2. Insufficient 5.55 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions as well as
how these roles promote Christian worldview principles to create a positive and
accepting workplace culture are incomplete or incomprehensive
Recommendations to the Leadership (B) 15 points
Criteria Description
PowerPoint and narrated presentation include recommendations for the leadership of
the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while
staying legally compliant with employment practices. (C2.3)
5. Target 15 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound
decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with
employment practices are substantial.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound
decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with
employment practices are relevant.
3. Approaching 11.85 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound
decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with
employment practices are overly simplistic.
2. Insufficient 11.1 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound
decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with
employment practices are irrelevant.
Application of Knowledge Gained 7.5 points
Criteria Description
PowerPoint and narrated presentation includes discussion of how the knowledge
gained from this course will be applied in the organization.
5. Target 7.5 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the
organization is clear and insightful.
4. Acceptable 6.53 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the
organization is detailed and descriptive.
3. Approaching 5.93 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the
organization is ambiguous.
2. Insufficient 5.55 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the
organization is insufficient.
Professionalism 7.5 points
Criteria Description
Narrated presentation exhibits appropriate professionalism delivered in a suitable
environment.
5. Target 7.5 points
Appearance and manner exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The
video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.
4. Acceptable 6.53 points
Appearance and manner exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The
video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.
3. Approaching 5.93 points
Appearance or manner within the video are lacking some degree of
professionalism; or the video includes some distraction in the environment or
background.
2. Insufficient 5.55 points
Appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional; or the video is taken
within a distracting environment or background.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Presentation of Content 45 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content
5. Target 45 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to
each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers.
The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable 39.15 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting
information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes
persuasive information from reliable sources.
3. Approaching 35.55 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some
inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
2. Insufficient 33.3 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong
sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Layout 15 points
Criteria Description
Layout
5. Target 15 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with
appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in
length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance
the readability of the text.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to
be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for
headings and text.
3. Approaching 11.85 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the
fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
2. Insufficient 11.1 points
The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with
large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult
due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background,
overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Language Use and Audience Awareness 15 points
Criteria Description
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
5. Target 15 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word
choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline,
and scope.
4. Acceptable 13.05 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for
the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
3. Approaching 11.85 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
2. Insufficient 11.1 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech
appropriately.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer
Mechanics of Writing 7.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 7.5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 6.53 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 5.93 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 5.55 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Format/Documentation 7.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 7.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 6.53 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 5.93 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 5.55 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
Total 150 points
