Performance Evaluation and Action Plan

Performance Evaluation and Action Plan - Rubric

Part 1: Analyze the Case 14 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Analyze the Case

5. Target 14 points

Analysis expertly addresses the case, including responsibility of the team lead,

relative stakeholders, and questions to determine next steps.

4. Acceptable 12.18 points

Analysis capably addresses the case, including responsibility of the team lead,

relative stakeholders, and questions to determine next steps.

3. Approaching 10.36 points

Analysis vaguely addresses the case, including responsibility of the team lead,

relative stakeholders, and questions to determine next steps.

2. Insufficient 9.66 points

Analysis inaccurately addresses the case, including responsibility of the team lead,

relative stakeholders, and questions to determine next steps.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Part 2: Identify the Larger Issues 14 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Identify the Larger Issues

5. Target 14 points

Analysis comprehensively identifies the larger issues, including policies and other

information affecting decisions and addressing potential positive and negative

outcomes attributed to no action versus action.

4. Acceptable 12.18 points

Collapse All

Analysis soundly identifies the larger issues, including policies and other

information affecting decisions and addressing potential positive and negative

outcomes attributed to no action versus action.

3. Approaching 10.36 points

Analysis weakly identifies the larger issues, including policies and other information

affecting decisions and addressing potential positive and negative outcomes

attributed to no action versus action.

2. Insufficient 9.66 points

Analysis poorly identifies the larger issues, including policies and other information

affecting decisions and addressing potential positive and negative outcomes

attributed to no action versus action.

Part 3: Create an Action Plan 28 points

Criteria Description

Part 3: Create an Action Plan

5. Target 28 points

Action plan skillfully includes 3-5 specific steps, how to sustain the culture, critical

stakeholders, anticipated challenges, team lead/department chair support,

evaluation procedures, and a timeline.

4. Acceptable 24.36 points

Action plan credibly includes 3-5 specific steps, how to sustain the culture, critical

stakeholders, anticipated challenges, team lead/department chair support,

evaluation procedures, and a timeline.

3. Approaching 20.72 points

Action plan inexplicitly includes 3-5 specific steps, how to sustain the culture, critical

stakeholders, anticipated challenges, team lead/department chair support,

evaluation procedures, and a timeline.

2. Insufficient 19.32 points

Action plan does not include or irrelevantly includes 3-5 action steps, how to sustain

the culture, critical stakeholders, anticipated challenges, team lead/department

chair support, evaluation procedures, and a timeline.

Organization 3.5 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 3.5 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the

required word count.

4. Acceptable 3.05 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is

within a reasonable range of the required word count.

3. Approaching 2.59 points

The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with

a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the

required word count.

2. Insufficient 2.42 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the

summary is widely outside of the required word count.

Documentation of Sources 3.5 points

Criteria Description

citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and

style

5. Target 3.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment

and style. Format is free of error.

4. Acceptable 3.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is

mostly correct.

3. Approaching 2.59 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some

key formatting and citation errors are present.

2. Insufficient 2.42 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1 No Submission 0 points

Mechanics of Writing 7 points

Criteria Description

includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use

5. Target 7 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are

varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 6.09 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder

comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some

practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 5.18 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent

language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.

2. Insufficient 4.83 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Total 70 points