Clinical Field Experience A: Informal Observations

Clinical Field Experience A: Informal Observations - Rubric

Summary of Observation Process and Experience 12 points

Criteria Description

Summary of Observation Process and Experience

5. Target 12 points

Summary substantially reflects on the observation process and the experience

conducting informal observations.

4. Acceptable 10.44 points

Summary soundly reflects on the observation process and the experience

conducting informal observations.

3. Approaching 8.88 points

Summary shallowly reflects on the observation process and the experience

conducting informal observations.

2. Insufficient 8.28 points

Summary inefficiently reflects on the observation process and the experience

conducting informal observations.

PSEL Standard 6 and Implications for Future Practice 12 points

Criteria Description

PSEL Standard 6 and Implications for Future Practice

5. Target 12 points

Reflection proficiently discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.

Elements of PSEL Standard 6 are expertly incorporated into reflection.

4. Acceptable 10.44 points

Reflection logically discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.

Elements of PSEL Standard 6 are accurately incorporated into reflection.

3. Approaching 8.88 points

Collapse All

Reflection inexplicitly discusses implications for application as a future practitioner.

Elements of PSEL Standard 6 are vaguely addressed.

2. Insufficient 8.28 points

Reflection unrealistically discusses implications for application as a future

practitioner. Elements of PSEL Standard 6 are inaccurately addressed.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Organization 3 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 3 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas

that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides

the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the

required word count.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is

within a reasonable range of the required word count.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with

a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the

required word count.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the

summary is widely outside of the required word count.

Mechanics of Writing 3 points

Criteria Description

includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use

5. Target 3 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-

developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are

varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 2.61 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder

comprehension. Variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some

practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 2.22 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent

language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.

2. Insufficient 2.07 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Total 30 points