Evaluation Plan Project: Evaluation Methodology

2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 1/5

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Describe the evaluation methodology plan you would use to evaluate your case study in a 2- to 3-page paper. You will:

Specify which research design, information sources, and data collection methods you would use.

23 (24.21%) - 25 (26.32%)

The response clearly, accurately, and with detail speci�es which research design, information sources, and data collection methods to use.

20 (21.05%) - 22 (23.16%) The response speci�es which research design, information sources, and data collection methods to use.

18 (18.95%) - 19 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately speci�es which research design, information sources, and/or data collection methods to use.

0 (0%) - 17 (17.89%)

The response vaguely or inaccurately speci�es which research design, information sources, and/or data collection methods to use, or fails to address one or more items.

Name: NURS_6541_Week7_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 2/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Identify the types of analyses you would perform on the gathered data.

Justify your selections.

Provide a list of stakeholders in your selected study.

23 (24.21%) - 25 (26.32%)

The response clearly, accurately, and in speci�c detail identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data, justi�es selections, and provides a complete list of stakeholders in the selected study.

20 (21.05%) - 22 (23.16%) The response identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data, justi�es selections, and provides a list of stakeholders in the selected study.

18 (18.95%) - 19 (20%) The response identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data in a vague or inaccurate manner, weakly justi�es selections, and/or provides an incomplete list of stakeholders in the selected study.

0 (0%) - 17 (17.89%)

The response identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data in a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete manner, provides a weak or nonexistent justi�cation of the selections, and/or provides an incomplete or nonexistent list of stakeholders in the selected study.

2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 3/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Write a paragraph describing the key components of your evaluation—the “who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how” of your evaluation.

14 (14.74%) - 15 (15.79%)

The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail describes the components of the evaluation, including the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”

12 (12.63%) - 13 (13.68%) The response describes the components of the evaluation, including the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”

11 (11.58%) - 11 (11.58%) The response describes the components of the evaluation in a vague and/or inaccurate manner, including details regarding the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”

0 (0%) - 10 (10.53%)

The response describes the components of the evaluation in a vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete manner, including details regarding the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”

Explain how you would measure success in your evaluation. Be speci�c.

Explain how you would summarize your results. Be speci�c.

14 (14.74%) - 15 (15.79%)

The response clearly, accurately, and in speci�c detail explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.

12 (12.63%) - 13 (13.68%) The response explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.

11 (11.58%) - 11 (11.58%) The response in a vague and/or inaccurate manner explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.

0 (0%) - 10 (10.53%)

The response in a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete manner explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.

2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 4/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting — Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 (5.26%) - 5 (5.26%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 (4.21%) - 4 (4.21%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 (3.16%) - 3 (3.16%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o� topic.

0 (0%) - 2 (2.11%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

Written Expression and Formatting — English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5.26%) - 5 (5.26%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4.21%) - 4 (4.21%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3.16%) - 3 (3.16%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2.11%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 5/5

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Written Expression and Formatting — The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 (5.26%) - 5 (5.26%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4.21%) - 4 (4.21%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3.16%) - 3 (3.16%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 2 (2.11%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 95

Name: NURS_6541_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

EXIT