knowledge management

V2050

INTE2397 Knowledge Management Assessment Task 3 KM Strategy Rubric

KM Strategy 50% of Total Course Mark

Levels of Achievement

Criteria Marks HD 80-100% DI 70-79% CR 60-69% PA 50-59% NN 0-49%

Introduction and Organisational Context

10.0

Excellent introduction and organisational context provided (industry, objectives, structure etc.)

Very good introduction and organisational context provided (industry, objectives, structure etc.)

Good introduction and organisational context provided (industry, objectives, structure etc.)

Adequate introduction and organisational context provided (industry, objectives, structure etc.)

Insufficient introduction and organisational context provided (industry, objectives, structure etc.)

Approach and Methods

5.0 Excellent explanation of approach (methods, data sources etc.)

Very good explanation of approach (methods, data sources etc.)

Good explanation of approach (methods, data sources etc.)

Adequate explanation of approach (methods, data sources etc.)

Insufficient explanation of approach (methods, data sources etc.)

Gap Analysis: Operational Infrastructure

12.5

Analysis demonstrates an excellent level of breadth and depth to reveal all of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Completely supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a very good level of breadth and depth to reveal most of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Most points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a good level of breadth and depth to reveal many of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Many points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a sufficient level of breadth and depth to reveal several of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Some points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis has insufficient breadth and depth to reveal the KM issues faced by the organisation. Not supported sufficiently by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Gap Analysis: Technological Infrastructure

12.5

Analysis demonstrates an excellent level of breadth and depth to reveal all of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Completely supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a very good level of breadth and depth to reveal most of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Most points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a good level of breadth and depth to reveal many of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Many points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a sufficient level of breadth and depth to reveal several of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Some points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis has insufficient breadth and depth to reveal the KM issues faced by the organisation. Not supported sufficiently by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Gap Analysis: Cultural Infrastructure

12.5

Analysis demonstrates an excellent level of breadth and depth to reveal all of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Completely supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a very good level of breadth and depth to reveal most of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Most points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a good level of breadth and depth to reveal many of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Many points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis demonstrates a sufficient level of breadth and depth to reveal several of the KM issues faced by the organisation. Some points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Analysis has insufficient breadth and depth to reveal the KM issues faced by the organisation. Not supported sufficiently by suitable references/empirical evidence.

Recommendations: Operational Infrastructure

12.5

Solutions address all of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise an excellent level of detail. Completely supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address most of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a very good level of detail. Most points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address many of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a good level of detail. Many points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address some of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a sufficient level of detail. Some points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions do not sufficiently address the issues identified in the gap analysis and do not comprise a sufficient level of detail. Few points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Recommendations: Technological Infrastructure

12.5

Solutions address all of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise an excellent level of detail. Completely supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address most of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a very good level of detail. Most points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address many of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a good level of detail. Many points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address some of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a sufficient level of detail. Some points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions do not sufficiently address the issues identified in the gap analysis and do not comprise a sufficient level of detail. Few points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Recommendations: Cultural Infrastructure

12.5

Solutions address all of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise an excellent level of detail. Completely supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address most of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a very good level of detail. Most points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address many of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a good level of detail. Many points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions address some of the issues identified in the gap analysis and comprise a sufficient level of detail. Some points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Solutions do not sufficiently address the issues identified in the gap analysis and do not comprise a sufficient level of detail. Few points are supported by suitable references/empirical evidence

Structure, presentation and alignment

10.0

Excellent logical structure, presentation and alignment

Very good logical structure, presentation and alignment

Good logical structure, presentation and alignment

Sufficient logical structure, presentation and alignment

Insufficient logical structure, inadequate presentation and lacks alignment