rural health and nursing
skimsibra
rubric.pdf
M5 GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY RUBRIC: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT (40 pts)
Last updated:3/24/2021 © 2021 School of Nursing - Ohio University Page 1 of 2
Criteria
Levels of Achievement Accomplished Needs Improvement Not Acceptable
Introduction (5 Points)
5 to 5 Points x Clearly states the purpose of the
paper. x Provides a comprehensive
overview of topic or questions. x Engages the reader. x Organized and has easy follow.
2 to 4 Points x Overview is provided, but
key points/ideas are missing.
x Purpose statement is not clear.
x Does not engage the reader.
x Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible
0 to 1 Points x Does not provide an
overview of the paper or is absent.
x No purpose statement.
Body (24
Points)
Key Requirement 1 – Identify 2 major issues faced by rural populations
6 to 6 Points x Demonstrates evidence of
research, includes the following: Two major issues and what specific social determinants of health significantly influence these issues.
x Writing is clear and shows critical thinking.
3 to 5 Points x Includes a description of
the issues and specific social determinants of health
x Writing is disorganized and does not contain evidence of critical thinking.
0 to 2 Points x Summary of the issues
and social determinants is poorly written; at least 3 topics are missing.
x No evidence of critical thinking.
Key Requirement 2 – Identify and describe 3 (out of 10) explicit assumptions of Roy’s Adaptation Model
6 to 6 Points x Writing shows evidence of
research. x Includes how these assumptions
apply to rural health. x Evidence of critical thinking.
3 to 5 Points x Student includes a
description of assumptions, does not connect how these assumptions apply to rural health.
x Writing is disorganized.
0 to 2 Points x No description of
assumptions. x No evidence of critical
thinking.
Key Requirement 3 – Identify what subsystems facilitate or hinder the overall system’s ability to meet the needs of the rural population
6 to 6 Points x Clearly identifies subsystems
that facilitate or hinder the needs of the population.
x Shows evidence of critical thinking.
3 to 5 Points x Vague discussion of
subsystems. x No discussion as to the
needs of the population.
0 to 2 Point x Student does not
discuss subsystems or meeting the needs of the population.
x No evidence of critical thinking.
Key Requirement 4 – Describe a plan or legislative process (may be one currently under review or recently passed) for improving the “healthcare system” and the potential impact on the rural population
6 to 6 Points x Includes a clear plan or
legislative process. x Thorough discussion of
improving the “healthcare system” and the impact on the population.
3 to 5 Points x Discusses a plan or
legislative process. x Does mention improving
the “healthcare system” and the impact on the population.
0 to 2 Point x Does not discuss a
plan or legislative process.
x Does not mention improving the “healthcare system” or
M5 GENERAL SYSTEMS THEORY RUBRIC: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT (40 pts)
Last updated:3/24/2021 © 2021 School of Nursing - Ohio University Page 2 of 2
Criteria
Levels of Achievement Accomplished Needs Improvement Not Acceptable x Shows critical thinking. impact on the
population. x No evidence of critical
thinking.
Conclusion (5 Points)
5 to 5 Points x Summarizes paper and reflects
on what the reader has learned from the paper.
x Demonstrates persuasive thought and is well organized.
2 to 4 Points x Merely summarizes the
introduction or contains new ideas not present in the paper contents.
x Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible
0 to 1 Points x Simply restates the
introduction or is absent.
x Disorganized to the point of distraction.
Stylistics (6 Points)
6 to 6 Points x APA Citations are appropriate. x Formatted correctly. x Reference page is complete and
correctly formatted. x At least 4 references provided:
Two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. *References not older than five years.
x More than 600 words excluding title and reference pages.
3 to 5 Points x APA Citations are
appropriate and formatted correctly.
x Reference page is formatted correctly.
x References are not professional or is not formatted correctly.
x Missing 1 professional reference.
x At least 600 words or more excluding title and reference pages.
0 to 2 Points x No citations are used
or citations are made but not formatted correctly
x Reference page is missing.
x Less than 600 words excluding title and reference pages.
Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc. –), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs - National Guideline Clearinghouse). References not acceptable (not inclusive) are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases. *All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information) Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret SafeAssign originality report.
