NURSE-PATIENT COMMUNICATION, INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION, AND PATIENT SAFETY
RUBRIC: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT (40 pts)
Last updated: 06/07/2017 © 2017 School of Nursing - Ohio University Page 1 of 2
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Accomplished Needs Improvement Not Acceptable
Introduction
(5 Points)
5 to 5 Points
Clearly states the purpose of the paper.
Provides a comprehensive overview of topic or questions.
Engages the reader.
Organized and has easy follow.
2 to 4 Points
Overview is provided, but key points/ideas are missing.
Purpose statement is not clear.
Does not engage the reader.
Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible
0 to 1 Points
Does not provide an overview of the paper or is
absent.
No purpose statement.
Body
(24
Points)
Key Requirement 1 - Principles of
Communication
8 to 8 Points
Clear definition of each of the seven principles with examples of how
three of the seven are applied to the
student's own interactions with
patients.
Evidence of critical thinking.
4 to 7 Points
Defines each of the seven principles, examples given are not
specific ones from practice but are
general to nursing
Lacking organization or critical thinking
0 to 3 Points
Does not provide definitions of each
principle,
no examples given,
no evidence of critical thinking.
Key Requirement 2 -
Methods of
Communication
8 to 8 Points
Clearly defines and describes each of the three methods of
interdisciplinary communication;
Chooses one that best applies to own practice, gives a clear
discussion of how the student uses that method.
4 to 7 Points
Lists the three methods of interdisciplinary communication
but does not describe each in
detail;
Does choose the one that applies
best, but discussion is disorganized.
More detail is needed.
0 to 3 Points
Discussion of methods of interdisciplinary
communication is weak
and disorganized;
Example given is weak
and disorganized.
No evidence of critical thinking.
Key Requirement 3 -
Ethical Principles and
Communication
8 to 8 Points
Student clear defines at least four ethical principles that can be
applied to patient clinician
communication and gives clear
examples of each;
Explains the impact of ethical communication and how patient
safety is impacted by team
communication.
Thoughts are well organized, each topic is thoroughly addressed.
4 to 7 Points
Student defines two to three ethical principles that can be applied to
patient clinician communication
and gives examples, but may be
missing depth;
Touches on patient safety and impact of ethics in communication.
Thoughts are somewhat disorganized, scattered
0 to 3 Points
Student's writing is difficult to follow;
Difficult to determine if all subjects have been
covered.
No evidence of critical thinking.
Conclusion
(5 Points)
5 to 5 Points
Summarizes paper and reflects on what the reader has learned from
the paper.
Demonstrates persuasive thought and is well organized.
2 to 4 Points
Merely summarizes the introduction or contains new ideas
not present in the paper contents.
Somewhat disorganized but still comprehensible
0 to 1 Points
Simply restates the introduction or is absent.
Disorganized to the point of distraction.
RUBRIC: WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT (40 pts)
Last updated: 06/07/2017 © 2017 School of Nursing - Ohio University Page 2 of 2
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Accomplished Needs Improvement Not Acceptable
Stylistics
(6 Points)
6 to 6 Points
APA Citations are appropriate.
Formatted correctly.
Reference page is complete and correctly formatted.
At least 4 references provided: Two (2) references from required course
materials and two (2) peer-reviewed
references. *References not older than five years.
More than 600 words excluding title and reference pages.
3 to 5 Points
APA Citations are appropriate and formatted correctly.
Reference page is formatted correctly.
References are not professional or is not formatted correctly.
Missing 1 professional reference.
At least 600 words or more excluding title and reference pages.
0 to 2 Points
No citations are used or citations are made but
not formatted correctly
Reference page is missing.
Less than 600 words excluding title and reference pages.
Peer-reviewed references include professional journals (i.e. Nursing Education Perspectives, Journal of Professional Nursing, etc. –), professional organizations (NLN, CDC, AACN, ADA, etc.) applicable to population and practice area, along with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs - National Guideline Clearinghouse). References not acceptable (not inclusive) are UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases. *All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information) Note: You will have three (3) attempts to submit a written assignment, only the final attempt will be graded. For each attempt you will receive a SafeAssign
originality report. This will give you a chance to correct the assignment based on the SafeAssign score. Click here to view instructions on how to interpret SafeAssign originality report.