Anthropology

ANT 111: Introduction to Anthropology _____________________________ ________ Writing Assignment Rubric*

*All parts and sections do not count equally

Excellent Good Fair Poor Th

es is

/I nt

ro

Introduction The Introduction is inviting, states the main topic, thesis, and position. Previews the structure and organization of the paper.

The introduction clearly states main topic, thesis, and position. Previews the structure and organization of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader.

The introduction states the main topic or position, but does not have a strong thesis and/or does not preview structure of the paper.

No clear introduction of the main topic, position, or structure of the paper.

Pa rt

1 : Focus on

Topic, Thesis Statement

There is one clear, well- focused topic and strong thesis statement. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.

Main idea is clear, but the supporting information is general.

Main idea is somewhat clear, but there is need for a thesis statement and/or more supporting information

Main idea is not clear. There is a random collection of information.

Pa rt

2 : B

od y/

Co nt

en t Understanding

and Support Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. Clear understanding of the readings and creative incorporation into arguments.

Supporting details and information are relevant, but reflect an average engagement with course materials. Decent understanding of course content. Some lines of evidence may not be well supported or explained.

Supporting details and information are relevant, but reflect lack of engagement or misunderstanding of course materials. Various aspects of thesis are not well supported or explained.

Supporting details and information are not clear or not related to topic. Major anthro concepts misunderstood or confused.

Pa rt

3 : C

on cl

us io

n,

Br oa

de r

A nt

hr o

Conclusion The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand the overall purpose. Explains why the topic/assignment matters within anthropology.

The conclusion is recognizable and ties up loose ends. Overall purpose of argument is less clear. No connection to broader purpose of the assignment within anthropology.

The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up loose ends. No broader relationship to course or general anthropology.

No clear conclusion.

Pa

rt 4

: M ec

ha ni

cs ,

G ra

m m

ar , C

it at

io ns

Word Choice Author uses vivid words and phrases. Choice and placement of words seems accurate, natural, and not forced.

Author uses vivid words and phrases. The choice and placement of words is sometimes overdone or awkward.

Author uses words that communicate clearly, but writing is often or mostly overdone or awkward.

Author uses a limited vocabulary, jargon, or clichés. Difficult to understand.

Grammar & Spelling

Writer makes just 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling. Sentences are well constructed and varied in structure and length.

Writer makes 3-4 errors that begin to distract from content. Most sentences are well constructed and varied in structure and length.

Writer makes 7-8 errors that distract from content. Sentences have a monotonous structure, and some may be difficult to understand.

Writer makes many errors that distract from content. Sentences are awkward, repetitive, or difficult to understand.

Citations Uses all required materials from class readings, citing them correctly in text and in bibliography.

Uses some required materials from class, and/or has 1-2 errors in citations and bibliography.

May use some/all required materials, but many errors present in citations and biblio and/or wrong style.

Does not reference required materials and/or has no citations or bibliography.

Comments:

1) Great job!

2) For next time, improve