Paper
MGMT861 V1 2020
Assessment 3: Individual Reflection Marking Criteria
Indicators of
ACHIEVED WITH DISTINCTION
Indicators of
ACHIEVED WITH MERIT
Indicators of
ACHIEVED
Indicators of
NOT ACHIEVED
Analysis of team dynamics
Understanding of team processes and theory
Team described very well
Highly developed understanding of team process and theory shown.
Team described well.
Sound understanding of team process and theory sown.
Team described satisfactorily.
Some understanding of team process and theory shown.
Team not described; context not clear.
Little or no understanding of team process and theory.
Insight into your own team experience
Superb insight shown into team experience
Good insight shown into team experience
Minimal insight shown into team experience
Little or no insight shown into team experience
Examples of effective and ineffective team processes
Highly effective use of examples of effective and ineffective team processes
Good use of examples of effective and ineffective team processes
Occasional use of effective and ineffective team processes
Minimal reference to team experience
Lessons for future team experience
Superb insight shown into lessons for future team experience
Good insight shown into lessons for future team experience
Some lessons for future team experience discussed
Lessons for future team experience not discussed or irrelevant
Use of literature
Selection of resources More than THREE journal articles together with other suitable resources
Minimum of THREE journal articles used together with other suitable resources
Minimum of THREE journal articles used
Less than minimum of THREE journal article used and/or over-reliance on non-journal sources
Analysis of resources Analytical approach A combination of analytical and descriptive approaches
Descriptive rather than analytical approach
Weak use of resources
Application of resources to your own team experience
Analysis of team experience consistently well integrated with literature
Analysis of team experience mostly integrated with literature
Analysis of team experience occasionally integrated with literature
No application of literature to the team experience
Note: Not all criteria carry equal weight
Comments:
Mark: /20
Grade: