Responses

This information is also available on the left menu under **How is my paper Graded** Very Poor 1.0 Poor 50.0 Beginning 62.5 Developing 75 Competent 87.5 Advanced 100

Length 25%

Only Fulfilled

less than one page

written material

Only fulfilled

one page of

written material

Written length is

equivalent to 1

and a quarter of written material.

Written length is

half of required

assignment or 1.25 page to 1.5

of material.

Written length is

1.5 pages to less

than 2 pages. Did not fulfill the

required length.

2-3 full pages of

written material.

Followed directions in

terms of length.

Grammar 25% Did not proof read. Written

with many grammatical and

spelling errors.

(10+ errors)

Many

grammatical

errors.(7-10). Proof reading

needs

improvement and or spent very

little time proof

reading.

Written with 5-7

mistakes.

Grammatical and spelling errors

are apparent, and

did not spend enough time

proof reading.

Written with 3-5

mistakes.

Grammatical and spelling errors

are apparent, and

did not spend enough time

proof reading.

Written with 1-2

mistakes, minor

grammatical and spelling errors.

Proof read well

but missed a few mistakes.

Written with no

grammatical and

spelling errors. Proof read well

and the paper is

polished.

Flow/Format

10%

Complete lack of

structure. Little

to no response to topic, planning

and

organization. Did not utilize

format available in Blackboard

Document

Some sense of

structure. Little

to no response to topic, planning

and organization.

Did not utilize format available

in Blackboard Document.

Attempts to focus

thoughts but

shifts or drifts focus. Attempt at

organization.

Few, if any, transitions

between ideas. Details lack

elaboration. May

or May not have used Format

Document

Usually has

single focus.

Some lapses and flaws. May lack

transition

between ideas. Repetitious

details/ several unelaborated

detail. . Use of

Format was utilized.

Single Focus.

Ideas are loosely

connected. Transition is

evident. Uneven

development of detail. . Use of

Format was utilized.

Single focus and

sense of unity

and coherence. Key ideas

developed.

Moderate to fluent

progression. Details

appropriate,

effective, vivid, and/or pertinent. .

Use of Format

was utilized.

Element/Princ 8% Did not Address Comparison of

Elements and

Principles of Design

Addressed 1 Element and or

Principle of

Design in comparison

Addressed 2 Elements and or

Principles of

Design in comparison

Addressed 3 Elements and or

Principles of

Design in comparison

Addressed 4 Elements and or

Principles of

Design in comparison

Addressed 5 or More Elements

and or Principles

of Design in comparison

Culture/Contx 8% Did not Address Question on

Cultural or Historical

Background of

Artist. Avoided

Question.

Demonstrates

little to no

thought on Historical and

Cultural

Connection to

influence on

Artists

Demonstrates

little

understanding on Historical and

Cultural

Connection to

influence on

Artist

Demonstrates

partial

understanding on Historical and

Cultural

Connection to

influence on

Artist

Demonstrates

adequate

understanding on Historical and

Cultural

Connection to

influence on

Artist

Demonstrates

sophisticated

understanding on Historical and

Cultural

Connection to

influence on

Artist

Era/Time 8% Did not Address conclusions on artist’s time

period and

his/hers view of the world.

Avoided

Demonstrates

little to no thought on

spirituality,

politics, economics, race

or ethnicity,

Demonstrates

little understanding to

thought on

spirituality, politics,

economics, race

Demonstrates

Partial understanding to

thought on

spirituality, politics,

economics, race

Demonstrates

adequate understanding to

thought on

spirituality, politics,

economics, race

Demonstrates

Sophisticated understanding to

thought on

spirituality, politics,

economics, race

Question. gender or gender identity,

ecological issues

or ethnicity,

gender or gender

identity,

ecological issues

or ethnicity,

gender or gender

identity,

ecological issues

or ethnicity,

gender or gender

identity,

ecological issues

or ethnicity,

gender or gender

identity,

ecological issues

Similarity 8% Did not address similarities of materials, ideas,

or use of

material in art works. Avoided

question.

Addressed

similarity to use of material, ideas

and subject with

very little thought to

connection

between works

Addressed

similarity to use of material, ideas

and subject with

little thought to connection

between works

Addressed

similarity to use of material, ideas

and subject with

partial in-depth thought to

connection

between works

Addressed

similarity to use of material, ideas

and subject with

adequate thought to connection

between works

Addressed

similarity to use of material, ideas

and subject with

strong in-depth thought to

connection

between works

Communication 8%

Did not Address your own

conclusions as to

meaning

Very little thought into

conclusions and

meaning behind work.

Conclusions are beginning to

show connection

to meaning.

Conclusions demonstrate

partial thought on

meaning.

Conclusions demonstrate

single focus but

loosely connected to

meaning.

Conclusions demonstrate

single focus of

unity and coherence in

connection to

meaning