DNP-PROJECT

- Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric - Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric

Criteri a

Ratings Pt s

This criterio n is linked to a Learni ng Outco me Critical Thinkin g and Logical Reaso ning Develo pment of Ideas

40 to >36.0 pts Excellent The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. 36 to >32.0 pts Good The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. 32 to >28.0 pts Fair The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information. 28 to >24.0 pts Poor The case study provided only minimal details and lacked

40 pt s

This criterio n is linked to a Learni ng Outco me Conten t Master y

25 to >23.0 pts Excellent The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information. 23 to >20.0 pts Good The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested. 20 to >18.0 pts Fair The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested. 18 to >15.0 pts Poor The response does not show mastery of the professional

25 pt s

This criterio n is linked to a Learni ng Outco me Inform ation Literac y Quality of Resour ces

15 to >14.0 pts Excellent Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. 14 to >12.0 pts Good Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. 12 to >11.0 pts Fair Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. 11 to >9.0 pts Poor The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from

15 pt s

This criterio n is linked to a Learni ng Outco me Writing Mecha nics, Gram mar,

10 to >9.0 pts Excellent Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences. 9 to >8.0 pts Good Minimal (1 - 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor Severe (8 - 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pt s

Total Points: 100

This criterio n is linked to a Learni ng Outco me Format Organi zation and Presen tation of Inform ation

10 to >9.0 pts Excellent The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. 9 to >8.0 pts Good The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor The presentation of information lacks a clear

10 pt s