Education HealthCare Organizational Planning Assignment
Minicaa
Rubric-HealthCareOrganizationalPlanning.pdf
Health Care Organizational Planning - Rubric Total 50 points
Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less than
Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
Mission and Vision
Statement
Mission and Vision Statement
0 points
A description of the mission
statement and strategic
initiative is not present.
1.95 points
A description of the mission
statement and strategic
initiative is present, but it
lacks detail or is incomplete.
2.25 points
A description of the mission
statement and strategic
initiative is present.
2.55 points
A description of the mission
statement and strategic
initiative is detailed.
3 points
A description of the mission
statement and strategic
initiative is thorough.
Role of the Mission
Statement and Strategic
Initiative
Role of the Mission
Statement and Strategic
Initiative
0 points
An explanation of the role of
the mission statement and
strategic initiative is not
present.
1.95 points
An explanation of the role of
the mission statement and
strategic initiative is present,
but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.
2.25 points
An explanation of the role of
the mission statement and
strategic initiative is present.
2.55 points
An explanation of the role of
the mission statement and
strategic initiative is detailed.
3 points
An explanation of the role of
the mission statement and
strategic initiative is
thorough.
Positions to Be Part of the
New Department or Team
Positions to Be Part of the
New Department or Team
0 points
The listing of all positions
that would be a part of the
new department or team is
not present.
2.28 points
The listing of positions
selected that would be a part
of the new department or
team is inappropriate or
incomplete.
2.63 points
NA
2.98 points
NA
3.5 points
A listing of all positions that
would be a part of the new
department or team is
accurate and complete.
Appropriate Wages
Appropriate Wages
0 points
A description of the
appropriate wage for each
position considering the local
region of the health care
organization selected and an
explanation of how the
individual wages must be
budgeted for including
considerations are not
present.
2.28 points
A description of the
appropriate wage for each
position considering the local
region of the health care
organization selected and an
explanation of how the
individual wages must be
budgeted for including
considerations are present,
but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.
2.63 points
A description of the
appropriate wage for each
position considering the local
region of the health care
organization selected and an
explanation of how the
individual wages must be
budgeted for including
considerations are present.
2.98 points
A description of the
appropriate wage for each
position considering the local
region of the health care
organization selected and an
explanation of how the
individual wages must be
budgeted for including
considerations are detailed.
3.5 points
A description of the
appropriate wage for each
position considering the local
region of the health care
organization selected and an
explanation of how the
individual wages must be
budgeted for including
considerations are thorough.
Budgeting Decisions and
Wage Offerings
Budgeting Decisions and
Wage Offerings
0 points
A description of the
budgeting decisions and
wage offerings needed to
approve filling the positions,
including team size and
annual budget
considerations, is not
present.
2.28 points
A description of the
budgeting decisions and
wage offerings needed to
approve filling the positions,
including team size and
annual budget
considerations, is present,
but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.
2.63 points
A description of the
budgeting decisions and
wage offerings needed to
approve filling the positions,
including team size and
annual budget
considerations, is present.
2.98 points
A description of the
budgeting decisions and
wage offerings needed to
approve filling the positions,
including team size and
annual budget
considerations, is detailed.
3.5 points
A description of the
budgeting decisions and
wage offerings needed to
approve filling the positions,
including team size and
annual budget
considerations, is thorough.
Operational Information
and Tools and Techniques
to Employ During the
Decision-Making Process
Operational Information and
Tools and Techniques to
Employ During the Decision-
Making Process
0 points
A discussion of the resources
needed to become
operational and techniques
that could be employed
during the decision-making
process is not present.
2.28 points
A discussion of the resources
needed to become
operational and techniques
that could be employed
during the decision-making
process is present but lacks
details or is incomplete.
2.63 points
A discussion of the resources
needed to become
operational and techniques
that could be employed
during the decision-making
process is present.
2.98 points
A discussion of the resources
needed to become
operational and techniques
that could be employed
during the decision-making
process is detailed.
3.5 points
A discussion of the resources
needed to become
operational and techniques
that could be employed
during the decision-making
process is thorough.
Presentation of Content
Presentation of Content
0 points
The content lacks a clear
point of view and logical
sequence of information is
unclear. Little or no
persuasive information from
reliable sources is included.
9.75 points
The content is vague in
conveying a point of view and
does not create a strong
sense of purpose. Some
persuasive information from
reliable sources is included.
Some persuasive information
11.25 points
The presentation slides are
generally competent, but
ideas may show some
inconsistency in organization
or in their relationships to
each other. Some persuasive
information is included.
12.75 points
The content is written with a
logical progression of ideas
and supporting information
exhibiting a unity, coherence,
and cohesiveness. Persuasive
information is included from
reliable sources.
15 points
The content is written clearly
and concisely. Ideas
universally progress and
relate to each other. The
project includes motivating
questions and advanced
organizers. The project gives
the audience a clear sense of© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2: Less than
Satisfactory 3. 3: Satisfactory 4. 4: Good 5. 5: Excellent
is included but may be
unreliable or lack credibility.
the main idea. Persuasive,
authoritative information
from reliable, credible
sources is included.
Layout
Layout
0 points
The layout is cluttered,
confusing, and does not use
spacing, headings, and
subheadings to enhance the
readability. The text is
extremely difficult to read
with long blocks of text, small
point size for fonts, and
inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings,
subheadings, indentations,
or bold formatting is evident.
3.25 points
The layout shows some
structure but appears
cluttered and busy or
distracting with large gaps of
white space or a distracting
background. Overall
readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too
many different fonts, dark or
busy background, overuse of
bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
3.75 points
The layout uses horizontal
and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes
the fonts are easy to read,
but in a few places the use of
fonts, italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy
background detracts and
does not enhance
readability.
4.25 points
The layout background and
text complement each other
and enable the content to be
easily read. The fonts are
easy to read and point size
varies appropriately for
headings and text.
5 points
The layout is visually pleasing
and contributes to the
overall message with
appropriate use of headings,
subheadings, and white
space. Text is appropriate in
length for the target
audience and to the point.
The background and colors
enhance the readability of
the text.
Language Use and
Audience Awareness
(includes sentence
construction, word choice,
etc.)
Language Use and Audience
Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word
choice, etc.)
0 points
Inappropriate word choice
and lack of variety in
language use are evident.
Writer appears to be
unaware of audience. Use of
primer prose indicates writer
either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them
inappropriately.
3.25 points
Some distracting
inconsistencies in language
choice (register) or word
choice are present. The
writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of
speech appropriately.
3.75 points
Language is appropriate to
the targeted audience for the
most part.
4.25 points
The writer is clearly aware of
audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for
the targeted audience, and
uses figures of speech to
communicate clearly.
5 points
The writer uses a variety of
sentence constructions,
figures of speech, and word
choice in distinctive and
creative ways that are
appropriate to purpose,
discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar,
language use)
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar,
language use)
0 points
Slide errors are pervasive
enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
1.63 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader.
1.88 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to
the reader.
2.13 points
Slides are largely free of
mechanical errors, although
a few may be present.
2.5 points
Writer is clearly in control of
standard, written, academic
English.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources
(citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc.,
as appropriate to assignment
and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
1.63 points
Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
1.88 points
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, although some
formatting errors may be
present.
2.13 points
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is
mostly correct.
2.5 points
Sources are completely and
correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free
of error.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
