Education Final Draft Assignment

3/2/25, 3:19 PM

Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc

Health Care and Wellness Provider and Faith Diversity: Final Draft - Rubric Total 200

points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target

Feedback on Previous

Draft and Insight From

the Course

Incorporation of feedback

on previous draft and

insight from experience

gained in the course.

0 points

Final draft does not

implement feedback from

previous draft.

13 points

Final draft implements

feedback from previous

draft.

15 points

Final draft implements

feedback from previous

draft and insight from

experience gained in the

course.

17 points

Final draft implements

feedback from previous

draft and insight from

experience gained in the

course in a thoughtful

manner.

20 points

Final draft implements

feedback from previous

draft and insight from

experience gained in the

course in a thoughtful

manner that demonstrates

personal ownership of the

revisions.

Worldview Questions

About Christianity and

Selected Faith

Answers to worldview

questions about

Christianity and selected

faith.

0 points

Worldview questions about

Christianity and selected

faith are not answered.

13 points

Worldview questions about

Christianity and selected

faith are answered

inaccurately. Answers are

not supported by sources.

15 points

Worldview questions about

Christianity and selected

faith are answered

accurately. Answers are

not clearly supported by

sources.

17 points

Worldview questions about

Christianity and selected

faith are answered

accurately and

demonstrate a basic

understanding of the faith.

Answers are supported by

sources.

20 points

Worldview questions about

Christianity and selected

faith demonstrate a deep

understanding of the faith.

Answers are supported by

sources.

Christianity and Selected

Faith: Importance to

Followers of That Faith

Christianity and selected

faith and their importance

to their followers.

0 points

Analysis of each faith and

the importance to their

followers are not present.

13 points

Analysis of each faith and

the importance to their

followers are described but

lack details. Descriptions

are not supported by

sources.

15 points

Analysis of each faith and

the importance to their

followers are described

with details. Descriptions

are not clearly supported

by sources.

17 points

Analysis of each faith and

the importance to their

followers demonstrate a

basic understanding of the

faith. Descriptions are

supported by sources.

20 points

Analysis of each faith and

the importance to their

followers are insightful and

demonstrate a deep

understanding of the faith.

Descriptions are supported

by sources.

Critical Common

Components of Healing

Process

Critical common

components of each faith

that are experienced in the

healing process.

0 points

Critical common

components of each faith

that are experienced in the

healing process are not

identified.

13 points

Critical common

components of each faith

that are experienced in the

healing process are

explained but lack details.

Explanations are not

supported by sources.

15 points

Critical common

components of each faith

that are experienced in the

healing process are

explained with details.

Explanations are not

clearly supported by

sources.

17 points

Critical common

components of each faith

that are experienced in the

healing process are

explained with details.

Explanations are

supported by sources.

20 points

Critical common

components of each faith

that are part of the healing

process are explained with

details that demonstrate a

deep understanding of the

connection. Explanations

are supported by sources.

Spiritual Perspective of

Christianity and Selected

Faith in the Experience of

Healing

The spiritual perspective of

Christianity and selected

faith in the overall

experience of healing.

0 points

The spiritual perspective of

Christianity and selected

faith in the overall

experience of healing is not

explained.

13 points

The spiritual perspective of

Christianity and selected

faith in the overall

experience of healing is

explained, but the

connection to the person

receiving care is unclear.

Explanations are not

supported by sources.

15 points

The spiritual perspective of

Christianity and selected

faith in the overall

experience of healing is

explained with the

connection to the person

receiving care.

Explanations are not

clearly supported by

sources.

17 points

The spiritual perspective of

Christianity and selected

faith in the overall

experience of healing is

explained clearly with the

connection to the person

receiving care.

Explanations are

supported by sources.

20 points

The spiritual perspective of

Christianity and selected

faith in the overall

experience of healing is

explained clearly with a

deep understanding of the

connection to the person

receiving care.

Explanations are

supported by sources.

Personal Spiritual

Perspective on Healing

A personal spiritual

perspective on healing.

0 points

A personal spiritual

perspective on healing is

not explained.

13 points

A spiritual perspective on

healing is explained but is

lacking the personal

connection.

15 points

A personal spiritual

perspective on healing is

explained clearly.

17 points

A personal spiritual

perspective on healing is

explained clearly with

insight.

20 points

A personal spiritual

perspective on healing is

explained clearly with deep

thought-provoking insight.

Personal Philosophy of 0 points 13 points 15 points 17 points 20 points

3/2/25, 3:19 PM

Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc

Health Care and Wellness

Philosophy pertaining to

diversity of faith in the

work of health care and

wellness.

Philosophy pertaining to

diversity of faith in the

work of health care and

wellness is not unclear or

insufficient.

Philosophy pertaining to

diversity of faith in the

work of health care and

wellness is explained but

lacking the personal

connection.

Personal philosophy

pertaining to diversity of

faith in the work of health

care and wellness is

explained clearly.

Personal philosophy

pertaining to diversity of

faith in the work of health

care and wellness is

explained clearly with

insight.

Personal philosophy

pertaining to diversity of

faith in the work of health

care and wellness is

explained clearly with deep

thought-provoking insight.

Thesis, Position, or

Purpose

Communicates reason for

writing and demonstrates

awareness of audience.

0 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is not discernible.

No awareness of the

appropriate audience is

evident.

9.1 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is unfocused or

confused. There is very

little awareness of the

intended audience.

10.5 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is discernable in

most aspects but is

occasionally weak or

unclear. There is limited

awareness of the

appropriate audience.

11.9 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is adequately

presented. An awareness

of the appropriate

audience is demonstrated.

14 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is clearly

communicated throughout

and clearly directed to a

specific audience.

Development, Structure,

and Conclusion

Advances position or

purpose throughout

writing; conclusion aligns

to and evolves from

development.

0 points

No advancement of the

thesis, position, or purpose

is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are

missing or inappropriate.

No conclusion is offered.

9.1 points

Writing lacks logical

progression of the thesis,

position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted,

but ideas are disconnected.

Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the

overall development of the

purpose.

10.5 points

Limited advancement of

thesis, position, or purpose

is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in

organization or the

relationship of ideas.

Conclusion is simplistic and

not fully aligned to the

development of the

purpose.

11.9 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is advanced in

most aspects. Ideas clearly

build on each other.

Conclusion aligns to the

development of the

purpose.

14 points

The thesis, position, or

purpose is logically

advanced throughout. The

progression of ideas is

coherent and unified. A

clear and logical conclusion

aligns to the development

of the purpose.

Evidence

Selects and integrates

evidence to support and

advance position/purpose;

considers other

perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the

thesis, position, or purpose

is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective

of the writer.

7.8 points

Evidence is limited or

irrelevant. The

interpretation of other

perspectives is superficial

or incorrect.

9 points

Evidence is used but is

insufficient or of limited

relevance. Simplistic

explanation or integration

of other perspectives is

present.

10.2 points

Relevant evidence that

includes other perspectives

is used.

12 points

Specific and appropriate

evidence is included.

Relevant perspectives of

others are clearly

considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling,

capitalization, punctuation,

grammar, language use,

sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or

syntax are pervasive and

impede meaning. Incorrect

language choice or

sentence structure errors

are found throughout.

7.8 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors are

present. Inconsistencies in

language choice or

sentence structure are

recurrent.

9 points

Occasional mechanical

errors are present.

Language choice is

generally appropriate.

Varied sentence structure

is attempted.

10.2 points

Few mechanical errors are

present. Suitable language

choice and sentence

structure are used.

12 points

No mechanical errors are

present. Appropriate

language choice and

sentence structure are

used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style,

such as APA, MLA, etc., for

college, subject, and level;

documents sources using

citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography,

etc., appropriate to

assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not

used. No documentation of

sources is provided.

5.2 points

Appropriate format is

attempted, but some

elements are missing.

Frequent errors in

documentation of sources

are evident.

6 points

Appropriate format and

documentation are used,

although there are some

obvious errors.

6.8 points

Appropriate format and

documentation are used

with only minor errors.

8 points

No errors in formatting or

documentation are

present.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.