g a
Rubric for Group papers
Group number:
|
A |
Product Descriptions [maximum 2 points] |
Score: 2 |
|
|
Outlines what it is, its functionality (1), what it does specifically (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
Core Competencies [maximum 2 points] |
Score: 2 |
|
|
Plans address both sustainability (1) and the unique differentiator (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
SWOT Analysis [maximum 2 points] |
Score: 2 |
|
|
Each element (0.5) is correctly specified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
Competitors in the market [maximum 2 points] |
Score: 2 |
|
|
Competitors are identified (1) |
|
|
|
Additional analysis (e.g., perceptual map, grouping, comparison) rather than a mere listing of competitors (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
Target Market [maximum 2 points] |
Score: 2 |
|
|
Target market is clearly specified (1) |
|
|
|
Additional analysis (e.g., chain ratio, TAM) to specify the target market (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
Marketing Mix [maximum 4 points] key point: whether the team applied theories/analysis with proper rationale to drive so-called “strategy” |
Score: 4 |
|
|
Product strategy: additional analysis (1) rather than the mere description |
|
|
|
Distribution strategy: provide rationale (1) rather than the mere suggestion |
|
|
|
Promotion strategy: at least one promotion idea is specified (1) |
|
|
|
Pricing strategy: additional analysis (1) rather than a merely provide the actual price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
G |
Overall Evaluation [maximum 6 points] |
Score: 6 |
|
|
Internal consistency (2): –1 per violation |
|
|
|
Originality/Use citations properly (2): –1 per violation; – 2 if the reference is not provided |
|
|
|
No key frameworks missed out (2): –1 per violation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Total |
Score: 20 |