| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| | | Field Experience A: Leadership and Collaboration |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Descriptive Summary of Observations and Interview | 35.0% | Not addressed. | Submission weakly summarizes the observations, interview, and instructional experiences. Key points are insufficient or irrelevant. | Submission minimally summarizes the observations, interview, and instructional experiences. Not all required elements are included, or key points are lacking substance or relevance. | Submission adequately summarizes the observations, interview, and instructional experiences. All required elements are included. Points are general, but appropriate. | Submission proficiently summarizes the observations, interview, and instructional experiences with discerning details. All required elements are fully addressed. |
| Conclusions and Applications to Future Practice | 45.0% | Not addressed. | Applications to future practice are incomplete or unrelated to what was described in the summary. | Applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. | Applications to future practice are basic, useful, and appropriate for students. | Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students. |
| Organization | 5.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the summary is widely outside of the required word count. | The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the required word count. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within a reasonable range of the required word count. | The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the required word count. |
| Format and Documentation of Sources (layout, citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Not addressed. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some key formatting and citation errors are present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style. Format is free of error. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
p07141980
Rubric_FieldexperienceAMarch.xlsx
