|
NURS_4005_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Provided a brief paragraph that included an overview of the assignment and its purpose.
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
13 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Presented an analysis of the data from the Sample Dashboard. Provided a thorough description of the area of performance selected that needs improvement and discussed the statistical findings and why the area was selected.
|
|
60 to >53.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
53 to >47.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
47 to >41.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
41 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
|
60 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Presented a nursing plan on three or more best practices that could be implemented to improve performance on the selected indicator. Included how each best practice could address the selected performance. Each best practice was supported by the professional literature.
|
|
120 to >107.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues
|
107 to >95.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
95 to >83.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
83 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
|
120 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Provided a summary of the main points in the paper.
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
Provided a fully developed summary of the main points with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Proficient
Provided a developed summary of the main points with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Basic
Provided a minimally-developed summary of the main points with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
13 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Provided an under-developed summary of the main points with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Basic
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.
|
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Basic
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.
|
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Basic
Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
|
6 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
|
XavierDz
Rubric.docx
