|
NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet it (for a total of at least nine paragraphs).
|
|
55 to >49.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.
|
49 to >43.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.
|
43 to >38.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed.
|
38 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing.
|
|
55 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePropose and explain how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Be specific and provide examples.
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.
|
17 to >15.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.
|
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner.
|
13 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe 1-2 legislative and advocacy activities that your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
|
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student's state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.... A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.... Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
|
|
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
|
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
|
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3-4 APA format errors.
|
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors.
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|