Case Study

1

Criteria

Excellent

Good

Developing

Needs Improvement

Failing

Criterion Score

Requirements of the Assignment

3 points

Met requirements of the assignment. Identification of the issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of research, class material and case study facts; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management

 

2.8 points

Met some of the requirements of the assignment.Identification of the issues were concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects an good  understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing one issue discussion or one or two were not developed. 

 

2.4 points

Identification of the issues were mostly concluded by using ideas that were supported from  of class material, case study facts and research; reflects a satisfactory understanding of behaviors that can affect effective management, but was missing two issues from the discussion or three were not developed leaving the impression of a general discussion.

 

2.1 points

 

Attempt was made to identify some of the issues but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present.

 

 

1.8 points

No Identification and/or explanation was not made or minimal depth  leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts.

 

Score of Requirements of the Assignment,/ 3

Content

2 points

Demonstrates strong knowledge and understanding of of motivation, trust and relationship building along with these impact organizational effectiveness

 

1.8 points

Demonstrates a thorough analysis of motivation, trust and relationship building. Good discussion supported by research.

 

1.6 points

Includes an analysis of the topics though not in depth. Most of the discussion was general and  underdeveloped by the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.4 points

Attempt was made to address the topics with many elements missing. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.2 points

Little to no research was evident and the discussion was absent and/or the explanation was lacking supportive reasoning.

 

Score of Content,/ 2

Analysis

3 points

Excellent analysis of your research on the concepts of motivation, trust, and behavior to the relationship-building issues identified in the case study.   thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success  

 

2.7 points

Good analysis your research on the concepts of motivation, trust, and behavior to the relationship-building issues identified in the case study. using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing examples.  

 

2.4 points

Analysis needs  improvement, are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material and showed a sufficient understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to successful handling; the supporting discussion was   underdeveloped because of missing examples or case study fact application.  

 

2.1 points

Attempt was made but elements were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present.  

 

1.8 points

 Little to no plan analysis and/or the explanation was lacking supportive reasoning.

 

Score of Analysis,/ 3

Develop a clear, concise, and focused strategy with a focus on individuals, the team and the organization

4 points

Excellent strategy  with  a clear, concise, plan with a focus on individuals, the team and the organization was concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success

 

3.6 points

Good strategy with a clear, concise, plan with a focus on individuals, the team and the organization using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing examples.

 

3.2 points

Most of strategy was clear, concise, plan with a focus on individuals, the team and the organization the icient understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to successful handling; the supporting discussion was   underdeveloped because of missing examples or case study fact application.

 

2.8 points

Attempt was made to on the strategy; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present.

 

2.4 points

No strategy was given or the at given was opinion and unsupported by material or case study facts.   

 

Score of Develop a clear, concise, and focused strategy with a focus on individuals, the team and the organization,/ 4

Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended

1 point

More than the requried sources  were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion.  

 

0.9 points

Required outside sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion

 

 

 

0.8 points

Required outside sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they mostly were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. . 

 

0.7 points

Less than the required number of sources was used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and/or the academic quality was not valid or failed to be appropriate to the topic under discussion.

 

0.6 points

No outside reference material was used.

 

Score of Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended,/ 1

Writing Mechanics

1 point

Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used.  0 to 2 errors noted.

 

0.9 points

Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted.

 

0.8 points

Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted.

 

0.7 points

Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found.

 

0.6 points

Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count.

 

Score of Writing Mechanics,/ 1

APA Style (7th ed.)

1 point

One to 2 APA style or usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.

 

0.9 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.

 

0.8 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 - 4 times in document.

 

0.7 points

Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to use APA citation when appropriate 5-6 times; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when requires APA citations are needed throughout the document.

 

0.6 points

No attempt at APA style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.

 

Score of APA Style (7th ed.),/ 1

Rubric Total ScoreTotal