Persuasive Speech Materials powerpoint outline

26 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The outline includes a strong, central idea for the speech that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.

23 to >20.0 pts

Competent

The outline illustrates a central idea for the speech with few tangents and diversions that unifies the main idea but lacks clarity or creativity

20 to >17.0 pts

Limited

The outline indicates a central idea for the speech, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.

17 to >14.0 pts

Poor

The outline does not include a unifying central idea for the speech to link key components of the argument together.

14 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The outline does not address this competency.

16 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The outline and presentation slides clearly communicate a central idea through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.

13 to >11.0 pts

Competent

The outline and presentation slides communicate a central idea by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.

11 to >9.0 pts

Limited

The outline and presentation slides attempt to communicate a central idea, but need more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics need improvement.

9 to >7.0 pts

Poor

The outline and presentation slides lack a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding

7 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The outline and presentation slides do not address this competency.

21 to >19.0 pts

Excellent

The outline and presentation slides demonstrate a strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and diverse academic research.

19 to >16.0 pts

Competent

The outline and presentation slides use key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently.

16 to >13.0 pts

Limited

The outline and presentation slides use limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to the main idea.

13 to >11.0 pts

Poor

The outline and presentation slides do not provide evidence to help support a clear argument.

11 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The outline and presentation slides do not address this competency

16 to >14.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation slides expertly use technology applications, media and electronic resources to develop and achieve assignment goals.

14 to >12.0 pts

Competent

The presentation slides utilize some features of technology applications, media and electronic resources to develop and support assignment requirements.

12 to >10.0 pts

Limited

The presentation slides use limited technology features, media and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact.

10 to >8.0 pts

Poor

The presentation slides lack an effective use of technology, media and electronic resources.

8 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The presentation does not address this competency

21 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation slides demonstrate strong evidence of audience awareness.

18 to >15.0 pts

Competent

The presentation slides demonstrate some evidence of audience awareness.

15 to >14.0 pts

Limited

The presentation slides demonstrate limited evidence of audience awareness.

14 to >13.0 pts

Poor

The presentation slides lack audience awareness.

13 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The presentation slides do not address this competency.

26 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The speech materials demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of best practices for speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Competent

The speech materials demonstrate proficient understanding of best practices for speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

20 to >16.0 pts

Limited

The speech materials demonstrate a vague understanding of speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

16 to >13.0 pts

Poor

The speech materials lack a clear understanding of speech and research delivery preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

13 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The speech materials do not address this competency.

4 pts

Excellent: Student Performance: Strong, original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.

3 pts

Competent: Student Performance: Central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.

2 pts

Limited: Student Performance: Attempts to form a cohesive idea, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key component

1 pts

Poor: Student Performance: No unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.

0 pts

Does Not Meet ExpectationsUnacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

4 pts

Excellent: Communicates a central idea through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.

3 pts

Competent: Communicates a central idea by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.

2 pts

Limited: Attempts to communicate a central idea, but needs more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics need improvement.

1 pts

Poor: Lacks a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

4 pts

Excellent: Strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research.

3 pts

Competent: Uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to support claims.

2 pts

Limited: Uses limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to main ideas.

1 pts

Poor: The central argument is not supported or developed through evidence.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

4 pts

Excellent: Demonstrates clear understanding of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Utilizes media and electronic resources to achieve assignment goals

3 pts

Competent: Demonstrates some knowledge of technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Media and electronic resources to support assignment requirements.

2 pts

Limited: Minimal knowledge of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Utilizes media and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact.

1 pts

Poor: Lacks a clear knowledge of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Does not utilize media and electronic resources effectively.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

4 pts

Excellent: Strong evidence of audience awareness.

3 pts

Competent: Some evidence of audience awareness.

2 pts

Fair: Limited evidence of audience awareness.

1 pts

Poor: Lacks audience awareness.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

4 pts

Excellent: Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the speech preparation process, and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

3 pts

Competent: Demonstrates proficient understanding of the speech preparation process, and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

2 pts

Limited: demonstrates a vague understanding of the speech preparation process and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

1 pts

Poor: lack understanding of the speech preparation process and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency