FM6

50 to >45.0 pts

Excellent

The final paper concisely presents one of the product strategies in detail with a proper rationale. The paper prioritizes the markets in which the strategy will be used and notates the evolution of the strategy over time.

45 to >40.0 pts

Competent

The final paper presents one of the product strategies in with an above average rationale. The paper prioritizes the markets in which the strategy will be used and provides some notations regarding he evolution of the strategy over time

40 to >35.0 pts

Limited

The final paper did not precisely present a product strategies in detail with a proper rationale. The paper limitedly discussed the markets in which the strategy will be used and somewhat presented the evolution of the strategy over time.

35 to >30.0 pts

Poor

The final paper did not precisely present a product strategies in detail with a proper rationale. The paper limitedly discussed the markets in which the strategy will be used and somewhat presented the evolution of the strategy over time.

30 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The final paper did not meet this competency.

25 to >23.0 pts

Excellent

The paper presents a clear and concise explanation of how the competition affected the team's decision making regarding the strategy of the company.

23 to >20.0 pts

Competent

The paper presents a somewhat clear and concise explanation of how the competition affected the team's decision making regarding the strategy of the company.

20 to >17.0 pts

Limited

The paper presents a limited explanation of how the competition affected the team's decision making regarding the strategy of the company.

17 to >15.0 pts

Poor

The paper presents a poor explanation of how the competition affected the team's decision making regarding the strategy of the company.

15 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The final paper did not meet this competency.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The final paper shows the progression from year one until the end of the simulation. It presented detailed results including sales, profit, ROS, stock price, and balanced scorecard.

31 to >28.0 pts

Competent

The final paper shows some progression from year one until the end of the simulation. It includes some results sales, profit, ROS, stock price, and balanced scorecard.

28 to >24.0 pts

Limited

The final paper shows limited progression from year one until the end of the simulation. It presented some results and did not include all of the following: sales, profit, ROS, stock price, and balanced scorecard.

24 to >21.0 pts

Poor

The final paper poorly depicted the progression from year one until the end of the simulation. It presented limited results with only reporting one or two key points (sales, profit, ROS, stock price, and balanced scorecard).

21 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The final paper did not meet this competency.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent

The final paper presents a concise and possible recommendations for a five year plan. The recommendations are well-developed and have appropriate supportive data.

31 to >28.0 pts

Competent

The final paper presents a some possible recommendations for a five year plan. The recommendations are well-developed and have some supportive data.

28 to >24.0 pts

Limited

The final paper presents limited recommendations for a fewer than five year plan. The recommendations are under developed and limited supportive data.

24 to >21.0 pts

Poor

The final paper presents only poor recommendations for a less than five year plan. The recommendations are poorly developed and have no supportive data.

21 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

The final paper did not meet this competency.

4 pts

Excellent: The final paper demonstrates excellent knowledge of enterprise-wide functions relative to the global economy.

3 pts

Competent: The final paper demonstrates competent knowledge of enterprise-wide functions relative to the global economy.

2 pts

Limited: The final paper demonstrates limited knowledge of enterprise-wide functions relative to the global economy.

1 pts

Poor: The final paper demonstrates poor knowledge of enterprise-wide functions relative to the global economy.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

4 pts

Excellent: The final paper demonstrates excellent professional written communication through research and proper presentation

3 pts

Competent: The final paper demonstrates above average professional written communication through research and proper presentation.

2 pts

Limited: The final paper demonstrates limited professional written communication through research and proper presentation.

1 pts

Poor: The final paper demonstrates minimal professional written communication through research and proper presentation.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

4 pts

Excellent: The final paper considers diverse populations within multiple settings of the policy.

3 pts

Competent: The final paper considers some diverse populations within multiple settings of the policy.

2 pts

Limited: The final paper considers limited diverse populations within multiple settings of the policy.

1 pts

Poor: The final paper considers minimal diverse populations within multiple settings of the policy.

0 pts

Unacceptable: The final paper does not meet this competency

4 pts

Excellent: The final paper demonstrates excellent analysis of information to solve business problems through comprehensive research and use of appropriate technologies.

3 pts

Competent: The final paper demonstrates competent analysis of information to solve business problems through comprehensive research and use of appropriate technologies.

2 pts

Limited: The final paper demonstrates limited analysis of information to solve business problems through comprehensive research and use of appropriate technologies.

1 pts

Poor: The final paper demonstrates poor analysis of information to solve business problems through comprehensive research and use of appropriate technologies.

0 pts

Unacceptable: The final paper does not meet this competency

4 pts

Excellent: The final paper applies excellent analytical tools and applications to develop analyses and solutions to address the needs of global stakeholders.

3 pts

Competent: The final paper applies competent analytical tools and applications to develop analyses and solutions to address the needs of global stakeholders.

2 pts

Limited: The final paper applies limited analytical tools and applications to develop analyses and solutions to address the needs of global stakeholders.

1 pts

Poor: The final paper applies poor analytical tools and applications to develop analyses and solutions to address the needs of global stakeholders.

0 pts

Unacceptable: The final paper does not meet this competency