Delivery of Higher-Order Thinking Lesson
KitaG
Rubric.docxClinical Field Experience B: Delivery of Higher-Order Thinking Lesson - Rubric
Collapse All
Lesson Summary
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Lesson Summary
5. Target
10.5 points
Brief but thoroughly described summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided.
4. Acceptable
9.14 points
Brief but clearly described summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided.
3. Approaching
7.77 points
Unfocused description of summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided.
2. Insufficient
7.24 points
Incomplete or insufficient description of summary of the lesson delivered, including strategies and assessments, is provided.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson
5. Target
10.5 points
A thorough discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined.
4. Acceptable
9.14 points
A credible discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined.
3. Approaching
7.77 points
An underdeveloped discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined.
2. Insufficient
7.24 points
An ineffective discussion of the role of higher-order thinking in the lesson, including any higher-order questions or discussions that took place, is outlined.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Additional Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Additional Higher-Order Thinking in Lesson
5. Target
10.5 points
A thoughtful, specific discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided.
4. Acceptable
9.14 points
A logical discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided.
3. Approaching
7.77 points
A vague discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided.
2. Insufficient
7.24 points
A flawed discussion of ways in which higher-order thinking could have been more deeply embedded into the lesson plan is provided.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Lesson Delivery Analysis and Feedback
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Lesson Delivery Analysis and Feedback
5. Target
10.5 points
Professionally described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation.
4. Acceptable
9.14 points
Properly described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation.
3. Approaching
7.77 points
Superficially described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation.
2. Insufficient
7.24 points
Unconvincingly described what was done well and what could have been done differently in lesson implementation.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Future Teaching Practice
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Future Teaching Practice
5. Target
10.5 points
Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is thoughtful.
4. Acceptable
9.14 points
Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is competent.
3. Approaching
7.77 points
Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is minimal.
2. Insufficient
7.24 points
Application of what was learned to future teaching practice is unrealistic.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Organization
7 points
Criteria Description
Organization
5. Target
7 points
The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable
6.09 points
The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
3. Approaching
5.18 points
The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.
2. Insufficient
4.83 points
An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Mechanics of Writing
10.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Target
10.5 points
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
4. Acceptable
9.14 points
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.
3. Approaching
7.77 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.
2. Insufficient
7.24 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
