SOCW 6530 WK 11 Final Evaluation and Self-Assessment

Evaluation of Goals and Objectives--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 16.2 (27.00%) - 18 (30.00%)

Evaluation demonstrates a thorough review of all 9 of the core competencies, learning goals, and objectives. The student thoroughly examines the skills developed and the areas where improvement is needed. Student explains how this information will be used to set goals and objectives for the next term.

Good 14.4 (24.00%) - 16.182 (26.97%)

Evaluation demonstrates a good review of all 9 of the core competencies, learning goals, and objectives. The student moderately examines the skills developed and the areas where improvement is needed. Student explains how this information will be used to set goals and objectives for the next term.

Fair 12.6 (21.00%) - 14.382 (23.97%)

Evaluation demonstrates a fair review of all 9 of the core competencies, learning goals, and objectives, and/or provided a good review of most points, but may have insufficiently reviewed 1 or more points. The student minimally examines the skills developed and the areas where improvement is needed. Student explains how this information will be used to set goals and objectives for the next term.

Poor 0 (0.00%) - 12.582 (20.97%)

Evaluation demonstrates a poor review of all 9 of the core competencies, learning goals, and objectives and/or provided a good review of most points, but may have insufficiently reviewed 1 or more points. The student doesn’t adequately examine the skills developed and the areas where improvement is needed. Student explains how this information will be used to set goals and objectives for the next term.

Evaluation of Skills--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 10.8 (18.00%) - 12 (20.00%)

Assessment demonstrates an excellent description of the skills developed during the internship and potential areas for improvement.

Good 9.6 (16.00%) - 10.788 (17.98%)

Assessment demonstrates a good account of the skills developed during the internship and potential areas for improvement.

Fair 8.4 (14.00%) - 9.588 (15.98%)

Assessment demonstrates a fair account of the skills developed during the internship and potential areas for improvement.

Poor 0 (0.00%) - 8.388 (13.98%)

Assessment demonstrates a poor account of the skills developed during the internship and potential areas for improvement. .

Action Plan--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 16.2 (27.00%) - 18 (30.00%)

Proposes an excellent action plan that fully explains how student's next field education experience might address those areas, and how participation in this course informs professional development.

Good 14.4 (24.00%) - 16.182 (26.97%)

Proposes a good action plan that sufficient explains how student's next field education experience might address those areas, and how participation in this course informs professional development.

Fair 12.6 (21.00%) - 14.382 (23.97%)

Proposes a fair action plan that explains how student's next field education experience might address those areas, and how participation in this course informs professional development. However, explanation may be lacking in detail and/or critical thought.

Poor 0 (0.00%) - 12.582 (20.97%)

Proposes a poor or no action plan that does not explains how student's next field education experience might address those areas, OR how participation in this course informs professional development.

Writing--

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 10.8 (18.00%) - 12 (20.00%)

Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.

Good 9.6 (16.00%) - 10.788 (17.98%)

Paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.

Fair 8.4 (14.00%) - 9.588 (15.98%)

Paper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

Poor 0 (0.00%) - 8.388 (13.98%)

Paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.