|
100 Level Written Communication Grading Rubric v2018
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing strategy appropriate to genre
threshold: 3.83 pts
|
|
5 pts
Consistently used correct writing strategies specific to genre
|
4.33 pts
Mostly used correct writing strategies specific to genre
|
3.83 pts
Used some correct writing strategies specific to genre
|
3.33 pts
Minimally used correct writing strategies specific to genre
|
0 pts
Did not use correct writing strategies specific to genre
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction and thesis statement
threshold: 15.3 pts
|
|
20 pts
Thoroughly engaging introduction, revealed a clear and substantive thesis
|
17.3 pts
Engaging introduction, revealed a clear thesis
|
15.3 pts
Introduction revealed a thesis lacking in clarity
|
13.3 pts
Introduction revealed a general topic but not a thesis
|
0 pts
Little or no introductory material
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Area (added by Instructor)
threshold: 11.48 pts
|
|
15 pts
Excellent
|
12.98 pts
Above Average
|
11.48 pts
Average
|
9.98 pts
Below Average
|
0 pts
Unacceptable
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization
threshold: 11.48 pts
|
|
15 pts
Structure enhanced the argument, clearly organized paragraphs and seamless transitions
|
12.98 pts
Mostly successful structure, paragraphs, and transitions
|
11.48 pts
Organization is inconsistent or uneven
|
9.98 pts
Organization is in the way of reading for content
|
0 pts
Lack of coherent organization
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence / Supporting ideas
threshold: 11.48 pts
|
|
15 pts
Consistently developed strong arguments with academically valid evidence
|
12.98 pts
Mostly developed strong arguments with academically valid evidence
|
11.48 pts
Developed some arguments with academically valid evidence
|
9.98 pts
Minimally developed arguments with academically valid evidence
|
0 pts
Did not develop arguments with academically valid evidence
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion
threshold: 3.83 pts
|
|
5 pts
Thoroughly engaging conclusion, fully reviewed thesis and main ideas
|
4.33 pts
Engaging conclusion, reviewed thesis and main ideas
|
3.83 pts
Conclusion reviewed some main ideas
|
3.33 pts
Conclusion minimally reviewed main ideas
|
0 pts
Little or no conclusive material
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar, spelling, and writing style
threshold: 11.48 pts
|
|
15 pts
Consistently used correct grammar, spelling, and writing style. Virtually no errors
|
12.98 pts
Mostly used correct grammar, spelling, and writing style. Some minor errors
|
11.48 pts
Frequent minor errors of grammar, spelling, or writing style
|
9.98 pts
Serious errors of grammar, spelling, or writing style
|
0 pts
Grammar or spelling errors get in the way of reading for content
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Layout and documentation (APA, Chicago, etc.)
threshold: 7.65 pts
|
|
10 pts
Consistently used correct layout and documentation. Virtually no errors
|
8.65 pts
Mostly used correct layout and documentation. Some minor errors
|
7.65 pts
Frequent minor errors of layout or documentation
|
6.65 pts
Serious errors of layout or documentation
|
0 pts
Little or no documentation
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
Flo20thebest
RUBRIC.docx
