Nursing peer review

profilebellavitaa333
Rubric.docx

Purpose 

A student peer review is a process in which students constructively evaluate the work of another student’s work which promotes mutual learning.  Feedback provided from a peer can help the learner master the concepts of an assignment. At the same time, the peer who provides the feedback on a student assignment learns to critically analyze the learner’s work.   

 Activity Learning Outcomes 

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to: 

1. Evaluate common primary care clinical practice guidelines for application in clinical practice (WO7.1) (CO3) 

2. Review and provide constructive feedback on a peer’s clinical practice guideline assignment. (WO7.1) (CO 3) 

 Requirements: 

1. The student will read the peer’s assigned CPG. 

2. Using the Peer Review Rubric provided, students will critically evaluate their assigned peer’s presentation. 

Preparing the paper 

In this activity you are “grading” your peer’s presentation with the rubric that your instructor uses.  Be mindful to follow any additional directions that are required as noted in the peer reviewer form. 

· Watch your assigned peer’s presentation. 

· Provide a “grade” for your peer by highlighting the box that you feel most represents the appropriate grade for each criteria. 

· Provide constructive feedback in the Peer Reviewer Comments section. 

· Discuss how the CPG that you reviewed can be applied to your clinical practice as stated in the rubric.  You can include your response at the bottom of the peer reviewer template form. 

CPG: Shulman, S., Bisno, A., Clegg, H., Gerber, M., …& Van Beneden, C. (2012). Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group A streptocococcal pharyngitis: 2012 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 55(10), e86-e102.

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT 

Category 

Points 

Description 

Peer review  

20 

40% 

The student “grades” a peer’s presentation based on the same rubric that the instructor uses for the assignment and thoughtfully provides constructive feedback.   

Application to Practice 

20 

40% 

The student discusses how the information learned in the peer presentation can be applied in their clinical practice rotation. 

 

40 

80% 

Total CONTENT Points= 40 pts 

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT 

Category 

Points 

Description 

Format 

 

10 

20% 

The peer evaluation is composed on the Peer Evaluation Template with clear and understandable comments  

 

10 

20% 

Total FORMAT Points= 10 pts 

 

 

 

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL=50 points 

 

Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 40 Points

Peer Review The student evaluates a peer’s presentation using the rubric for the assignment and provides thoughtful constructive feedback in all five areas.  *Constructive feedback implies that the student does not just state vague or general comments such as “well done” or “I agree”.

20 pts

Excellent

Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form AND Student provides constructive feedback to the peer in each of the 5 areas.

18 pts

V. Good

Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form BUT The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 1 of the 5 areas.

16 pts

Satisfactory

Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form BUT The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 2-3 areas.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form BUT The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 4 areas.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Student did not provide a “grade” in every area of the rubric form OR The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in all 5 areas OR The student does not complete this section

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication to Practice

The student analyzes the CPG and identifies three specific examples that can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice. This analysis is clearly stated as an addendum at the bottom of the template.

20 pts

Excellent

Student identifies three specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice AND The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic

18 pts

V. Good

Student identifies two specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice AND The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic

16 pts

Satisfactory

Student identifies one specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice AND The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Student identifies one or more examples BUT The nature of the response is vague or irrelevant to the topic

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Student provides a response which contains no specific examples OR The student does not complete this section

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 10 Points

Format Peer evaluation is written on the peer evaluation template. The evaluation is easy to understand with correct grammar, syntax, or spelling.

10 pts

Excellent

The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment AND The evaluation is easy to understand with very few (0-1) grammatical, syntax, or spelling errors

9 pts

V. Good

The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment AND The evaluation is easy to understand with a few (2-3) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors

8 pts

Satisfactory

The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment AND The evaluation is easy to understand with many (4-5) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors

5 pts

Needs Improvement

The peer evaluation template is not used for the assignment OR The evaluation is difficult to understand very many (6-9) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The peer evaluation template is not used OR The evaluation is difficult to understand with 10 or more grammatical, syntax, or spelling errors OR The student does not complete this section.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Total Points: 50