Business Statistics

profileHuzaifaaa
Rubric.docx

Rubric_Individual_2021S1_Melb

Rubric_Individual_2021S1_Melb

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeStatistical Analysis and Interpretation (30 pts)

30 to >24.0 Pts

Outstanding

The statistical analysis is accurate and complete (using appropriate formula and inference theory). Interpretation of statistical findings are precise, and understandable in Statistical and English language. A balanced display of numbers, graphs, and words, organized in a clear and readable way.

24 to >21.0 Pts

Very Good

The statistical analysis is mostly accurate but with minor flaws. The interpretation of statistical findings are mostly correct but with minor gaps, and understandable in Statistical and English language. A balanced display of statistical numbers, graphs, and words, but with minor flaws in clarity and coherence.

21 to >18.0 Pts

Good

The statistical analysis are partially accurate with some flaws. The interpretation of statistical findings is partially appropriate, but some gaps in both interpretation and results communication. An appropriate display of statistical numbers, graphs, and words, but with some flaws in clarity and coherence.

18 to >15.0 Pts

Pass

The statistical analysis are partially accurate with some major flaws for sub-questions. The interpretation of statistical findings is partially appropriate, but some gaps in both interpretation and results communication. An display of statistical numbers, graphs, and words, but with some apparent flaws in clarity and coherence.

15 to >0 Pts

Unsatisfactory

The statistical analysis are mostly incorrect with significant flaws. Interpretation of statistical findings is irrelevant to statistical theories and incorrect. An unbalanced display of statistical numbers, graphs, and words and poorly organised.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProfessional Report - Executive Summary (3.5 pts)

3.5 to >2.5 Pts

Outstanding/Very Good

Demonstrated thorough and in-depth understanding of an overview of key essential information comprising a report: context to the topic, scope of the investigation, methodology, and key findings and recommendations.

2.5 to >2.0 Pts

Good

Demonstrated a good understanding of an overview of key essential information comprising a report: context to the topic, scope of the investigation, methodology, and key findings and recommendations.

2 to >1.5 Pts

Pass

Demonstrated adequate understanding an overview of key essential information comprising a report: context to the topic, scope of the investigation, methodology, and key findings and recommendations.

1.5 to >0 Pts

Unsatisfactory

Failed to demonstrate elemental understanding an overview of key essential information comprising a report: context to the topic, scope of the investigation, methodology, and key findings and recommendations.

3.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProfessional Report- Introduction (3.5 pts)

3.5 to >2.5 Pts

Outstanding/Very Good

Demonstrated thorough and in-depth understanding of three key areas: context of the topic; what the topic is & why it is important; the aims/objectives of the report.

2.5 to >2.0 Pts

Good

Demonstrated good understanding of three key areas: context of the topic; what the topic is & why it is important; the aims/objectives of the report.

2 to >1.5 Pts

Pass

Demonstrated adequate understanding of three key areas: context of the topic; what the topic is & why it is important; the aims/objectives of the report.

1.5 to >0 Pts

Unsatisfactory

Failed to demonstrate understanding of three key areas: context of the topic; what the topic is & why it is important; the aims/objectives of the report.

3.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProfessional Report - Format (3 pts)

3 to >2.0 Pts

Outstanding/Very Good

Properly formatted with page numbering, informative heading and sub-headings, labelled graphs and tables (with proper titles)

2 Pts

Good

Minor flaws in formatting

2 to >1.5 Pts

Pass

Some flaws in formatting

1.5 to >0 Pts

Unsatisfactory

Poorly formatted

3 pts

Total points: 40