Summary

profileBebisha
Rubric.docx

Rubric

Inadequate

Not Competent

Competent

Proficient

Content of Review

Points:

(0.00%)

No content (missed all major points of the content). Incomplete summary. Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis. There is no clear introduction or conclusion.

Points:

20 (20.00%)

Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed). Basic summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight. Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper.

Points:

32 (32.00%)

Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed). Adequate summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported.

Points:

40 (40.00%)

In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper.

Reflection

Points:

(0.00%)

Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness.

Points:

24 (24.00%)

Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings

Points:

30 (30.00%)

Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications.

Organization and Development of Ideas

Points:

(0.00%)

No evidence of structure or organization.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed

Points:

12 (12.00%)

Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected.

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions.

Mechanics

Points:

(0.00%)

Length requirement is not met; poor content Numerous grammatical errors (distracting) Numerous punctuation errors Neither style is used Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines.

Points:

7.5 (7.50%)

Length requirement is not met; minimal content 5-6 grammatical errors 5-6 punctuation errors Demonstrates little ability to adhere to APA/MLA guidelines, more than two errors present Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines.

Points:

12 (12.00%)

Length requirement is met with adequate content 3-4 grammatical errors. 3-4 punctuation errors. Adheres consistently to APA/MLA guidelines, however, one error present. Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both

Points:

15 (15.00%)

Meets length requirement. 1-2 grammatical errors. 1-2 punctuation errors. APA/MLA Guidelines are meticulously followed. Adheres to Font/Spacing Guide