Summary
Rubric
|
Inadequate |
Not Competent |
Competent |
Proficient |
|
|
Content of Review |
Points: 0 (0.00%) No content (missed all major points of the content). Incomplete summary. Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis. There is no clear introduction or conclusion. |
Points: 20 (20.00%) Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed). Basic summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight. Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper. |
Points: 32 (32.00%) Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed). Adequate summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported. |
Points: 40 (40.00%) In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper. |
|
Reflection |
Points: 0 (0.00%) Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported. |
Points: 15 (15.00%) Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness. |
Points: 24 (24.00%) Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings |
Points: 30 (30.00%) Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications. |
|
Organization and Development of Ideas |
Points: 0 (0.00%) No evidence of structure or organization. |
Points: 7.5 (7.50%) Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed |
Points: 12 (12.00%) Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected. |
Points: 15 (15.00%) Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions. |
|
Mechanics |
Points: 0 (0.00%) Length requirement is not met; poor content Numerous grammatical errors (distracting) Numerous punctuation errors Neither style is used Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines. |
Points: 7.5 (7.50%) Length requirement is not met; minimal content 5-6 grammatical errors 5-6 punctuation errors Demonstrates little ability to adhere to APA/MLA guidelines, more than two errors present Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines. |
Points: 12 (12.00%) Length requirement is met with adequate content 3-4 grammatical errors. 3-4 punctuation errors. Adheres consistently to APA/MLA guidelines, however, one error present. Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both |
Points: 15 (15.00%) Meets length requirement. 1-2 grammatical errors. 1-2 punctuation errors. APA/MLA Guidelines are meticulously followed. Adheres to Font/Spacing Guide |