CASE ASSIGNMENT DUE IN 48 HOURS

Rubric Name: Stage 1 Grading Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria

Far Above Standards

Above Standards

Meets Standards

Below Standards

Well Below Standards

Criterion Score

Introduction Describes the organization and provides an introduction to the overall Report

10 points

9-10 Points

The introduction is very effective; is clear, logical, derived from the Case Study; and demonstrates a sophisticated level of writing.

8.5 points

8.5 Points

The introduction is clear, logical, and derived from the Case Study.

7.5 points

7.5 Points

The introduction is adequate, and is derived from the Case Study

6.5 points

6.5 Points

The introduction is not clear, logical and/or derived from the Case Study.

0 points

0-5 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study;  and/or is not original work for this class section.

/ 10

Strategy How the system will support the organization’s strategy as derived from the case study

20 points

18-20 Points

The explanation is clear, logical and fully supported using a sophisticated level of writing

17 points

16-17 Points

The explanation is clear, logical and supported.

15 points

14-15 Points

The explanation is provided and supported.

13 points

12-13 Points

The explanation is not clear, logical and/or supported

0 points

0-11 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

/ 20

Competitive Advantage Explanation of how the system and its data can be used for competitive advantage

15 points

13-15 Points

Clear, complete, logical, derived from the Case Study, and demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.  .

12.75 points

12.75 Points

Complete and accurate; derived from the case study, demonstrates analysis and effective writing. .

11 points

10-11 Points

Explanation is provided and related to the Case Study, may lack specifics and/or clear logic.

9 points

9 Points

Explanation is not clear, logical and/or supported.

0 points

0-8 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effor , is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

 

/ 15

Strategic Objectives Three objectives derived from Strategic Goals in Case Study with explanation of how new hiring system would help achieve. Generally. 0-5 points per objective. Both quantity and quality evaluated.

15 points

13-15 Points

Objectives are clear, measurable and time-bound and are strongly and fully explained using a sophisticated level of writing.

12.75 points

12.75 Points

Objectives are clear, measurable and time-bound, and are clearly explained.

11 points

10-11 Points

Objectives are somewhat clear, measurable and time-bound, and are explained.

9 points

9 Points

Objectives are not clear, measurable and/or time-bound, and/or are not explained.

0 points

0-8 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

 

/ 15

Decision-Making Types of decisions supported by the system for each of the three levels of the organization. Generally, 0-5 points per decision example. Both quantity and quality evaluated.

15 points

13-15 Points

Identified correctly and fully, clearly and logically explained; are derived from the Case Study; and demonstrate sophisticated analysis and writing.

12.75 points

12.75 Points

Identified correctly and clearly and logically explained; are derived from the Case Study; and demonstrate analysis and effective writing.

11 points

10-11 Points

Identified correctly and explained and are derived from the Case Study.

9 points

9 Points

Not all provided; and/or are not correct and/or not derived from the Case Study.

0 points

0-8 Points

Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.

 

/ 15

Research Two or more sources--one source from within the IFSM 300 course content and one external (other than the course materials)

10 points

9-10 Points

Required resources are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute strongly to the analysis.  References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style

8.5 points

8.5 Points

At least two sources are incorporated and are relevant and somewhat support the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style .

7.5 points

7.5 Points

Only one resource is used and properly incorporated and/or reference(s) lack correct APA style.

6.5 points

6.5 points

A source may be used, but is not properly incorporated or used, and/or is not effective or appropriate; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations.

0 points

0-5 Points

No course content or external research incorporated; or reference listed is not cited within the text.

/ 10

Format Uses outline format provided; includes Title Page and Reference Page

15 points

13-15 Points

Well organized and easy to read.  Very few or no errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.

12.75 points

12.75 Points

Effective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.

11 points

10-11 Points

Some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling. Report is double spaced and written in third person .

9 points

9 Points

Not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not double-spaced and written in third person.

0 points

0-8 Points

Extremely poorly written, has many grammar and/or spelling errors, or does not convey the information.