Journal
Herealshi
Rubric.docx
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
14 (70%) - 15 (75%) Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence-based resources.
12 (60%) - 13 (65%) Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence-based resources.
10 (50%) - 11 (55%) Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
br> Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources but they may not fully support the approach provided.
0 (0%) - 9 (45%) Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%) - 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%) - 2 (10%) Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%) - 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
0 (0%) - 1 (5%) Poor
No purpose statement was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
2.5 (12.5%) - 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
2 (10%) - 2 (10%) Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
1.5 (7.5%) - 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
0 (0%) - 1 (5%) Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the
assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and
analytic thinking.
14 (70%)
-
15 (75%)
Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment t
opics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence
-
based resources.
12 (60%)
-
13 (65%)
Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good
breadth and depth about each of the as
signment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence
-
based resources.
10 (50%)
-
11 (55%)
Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
br> Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence
-
based resources but they
may not fully support the approach provide
d.
0 (0%)
-
9 (45%)
Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not
addressed or inadequately addressed.
Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence
-
based resources.
Qual
ity of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%)
-
2.5 (12.5%)
Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%)
-
2 (10%)
Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not
descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%)
-
1.5 (7.5%)
Fair
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and
analytic thinking.
14 (70%) - 15 (75%) Excellent
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes superior support of the approach with significant evidence-based resources.
12 (60%) - 13 (65%) Good
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good
breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Assignment includes additional support of the approach with some evidence-based resources.
10 (50%) - 11 (55%) Fair
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately
addressed.
br> Assignment may include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources but they
may not fully support the approach provided.
0 (0%) - 9 (45%) Poor
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not
addressed or inadequately addressed.
Assignment fails to include additional support of the approach with evidence-based resources.
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.
2.5 (12.5%) - 2.5 (12.5%) Excellent
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
2 (10%) - 2 (10%) Good
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1.5 (7.5%) - 1.5 (7.5%) Fair
