Applying the Precede-Proceed Model

Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations

Very Good

Outstanding

Description of the Precede-Proceed model in own words. (10 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately describe the Precede-Proceed model

Points Range:8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Adequate description and support of the Precede-Proceed model, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 9 (9.00%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of the Precede-Proceed model with minimal concerns

Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of the Precede-Proceed model

Discussion and comparison of the behavior/lifestyle and environmental factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 2: Epidemiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Assessment. (10 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss and compare the behavior/lifestyle and environmental factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 2: Epidemiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Assessment

Points Range:8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Adequate discussion, comparison, and support of how the intrapersonal and interpersonal levels can/do influence the assigned health topic using the Phase 2: Epidemiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Assessment, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 9 (9.00%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported discussion and comparison of how the intrapersonal and interpersonal levels can/do influence the assigned health topic using the Phase 2: Epidemiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Assessment with minimal concerns

Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion and comparison of how the intrapersonal and interpersonal levels can/do influence the assigned health topic using the Phase 2: Epidemiological, Behavioral, and Environmental Assessment

Explanation of why these behavior/lifestyle and environmental factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group. (10 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain why these behavior/lifestyle and environmental factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group

Points Range:8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Adequate explanation and support of why these behavior/lifestyle and environmental factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 9 (9.00%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of why these behavior/lifestyle and environmental factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group with minimal concerns

Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of why these behavior/lifestyle and environmental factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group

Discussion of the predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 3-Educational and Ecological assessment. (10 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 3-Educational and Ecological assessment

Points Range:8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Adequate discussion and support of predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 3-Educational and Ecological assessment, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 9 (9.00%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported discussion of predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 3-Educational and Ecological assessment with minimal concerns

Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 3-Educational and Ecological assessment

Explanation of why these predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group. (10 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain why these predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group

Points Range:8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Adequate explanation and support of why these predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 9 (9.00%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of why these predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group with minimal concerns

Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of why these predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group

Discussion of the health education and policy regulation factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 4-Adminstration and policy assessment and Intervention Alignment. (10 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss health education and policy regulation factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 4-Adminstration and policy assessment and Intervention Alignment

Points Range:8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Adequate discussion of health education and policy regulation factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 4-Adminstration and policy assessment and Intervention Alignment, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 9 (9.00%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported discussion of health education and policy regulation factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 4-Adminstration and policy assessment and Intervention Alignment with minimal concerns

Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of health education and policy regulation factors for your topic and target group using the Phase 4-Adminstration and policy assessment and Intervention Alignment

Explanation of why these health education and policy regulation factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group. (10 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7 (7.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately explain why these health education and policy regulation factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group

Points Range:8 (8.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Adequate explanation and support of why these health education and policy regulation factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:9 (9.00%) - 9 (9.00%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported explanation of why these health education and policy regulation factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group with minimal concerns

Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of why these health education and policy regulation factors were selected and deemed important to your health topic and target group

Discussion of how Phases 5–8 of the Proceed part of the model apply to your topic and target group. (5 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss how Phases 5–8 of the Proceed part of the model apply to your topic and target group

Points Range:4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)

Adequate discussion and support of how Phases 5–8 of the Proceed part of the model apply to your topic and target group, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) - 4.5 (4.50%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported discussion of how Phases 5–8 of the Proceed part of the model apply to your topic and target group with minimal concerns

Points Range:5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly discussion of how Phases 5–8 of the Proceed part of the model apply to your topic and target group

Summary of the Precede-Proceed Model and its application to your selected target group and assigned health topic. (5 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 3 (3.00%)

Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately summarize the Precede-Proceed Model and its application to your selected target group and assigned health topic

Points Range:4 (4.00%) - 4 (4.00%)

Adequate summary of the Precede-Proceed Model and its application to your selected target group and assigned health topic, but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:4.5 (4.50%) - 4.5 (4.50%)

Generally thorough, well organized, and supported summary of the Precede-Proceed Model and its application to your selected target group and assigned health topic with minimal concerns

Points Range:5 (5.00%) - 5 (5.00%)

Fully developed and supported, insightful, credible, and scholarly summary of the Precede-Proceed Model and its application to your selected target group and assigned health topic

Written Communication: Extent to which writing is professional, appropriate, clear, properly formatted, grammatically and structurally correct, synthesized, supported, and scholarly. (20 points)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 15 (15.00%)

Writing does not meet basic expectations (e.g. clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, source citation, references, title page, synthesis of source material, insufficient originality, etc.)

Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 17 (17.00%)

Writing adequately meets expectations  for writing and synthesis but with infrequent and minor issues

Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 18 (18.00%)

Writing is generally thorough and grammatically correct, with proper formatting and minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are supported without reliance on quoting

Points Range:19 (19.00%) - 20 (20.00%)

Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, supported, scholarly, and free of writing errors. Concepts are connected throughout paper with appropriate transitions and multiple appropriate resources and examples.