Computer archtecture paper

profileADJOUZA
Rubric.docx

Research Paper Rubric (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

20.0 to >18.2 pts

Excellent

Main points are clear and supporting evidence are detailed.

18.2 to >16.4 pts

Good

Main points are clear and well developed. Evidence and detail provide strong support for the data management project

16.4 to >14.6 pts

Satisfactory

Main points are clear and developed. Evidence and detail adequately support the data management project.

14.6 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Main points are clear but not developed. More supporting evidence and detail are needed.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Interpretation

20.0 to >18.2 pts

Excellent

Ability to analyze & interpret data is superior.

18.2 to >16.4 pts

Good

Ability to analyze & interpret data is proficient.

16.4 to >14.6 pts

Satisfactory

Ability to analyze & interpret data is basic.

14.6 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Ability to analyze & interpret data is emerging.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKnowledge of Content

20.0 to >18.2 pts

Excellent

Exceeds requirements in demonstrating strong knowledge of content and depth.

18.2 to >16.4 pts

Good

Knowledge of content and depth are appropriately reflected in document.

16.4 to >14.6 pts

Satisfactory

Knowledge of content and depth are satisfactory.

14.6 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Some knowledge of content and depth are evident.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Purpose

20.0 to >18.2 pts

Excellent

Work stands out as exemplary, is accurately detailed. The data management project is appropriately addressed.

18.2 to >16.4 pts

Good

Work is accurately detailed. The data management project is adequately addressed.

16.4 to >14.6 pts

Satisfactory

Work reflects the assignment purpose. The data management project has most if not all of the components addressed.

14.6 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Work rarely reflects the assignment purpose. The data management project is only half completed.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics/Submission

20.0 to >18.2 pts

Excellent

Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized. Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources.

18.2 to >16.4 pts

Good

Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized. Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources.

16.4 to >14.6 pts

Satisfactory

Knowledge of content and depth are satisfactory.

14.6 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; poorly organized. Uses APA guidelines with major violations to cite sources.

20.0 pts

Research Paper Rubric (1)