|
General Description
|
|
5.0 to >3.5 pts
Strong
Student gives a strong general description of at least five sentences in which they discuss why the sacred space was built and the significance of the location.
|
3.5 to >2.0 pts
Competent
Student gives a good general description in which they discuss why the sacred space was built and the significance of the location.
|
2.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Student gives a general description that does not discuss why the sacred space was built, does not discuss the significance of the location, or lacking in content.
|
0.0 pts
No credit
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArchitectural Design
|
|
5.0 to >3.5 pts
Strong
Student provides a strong explanation of architectural design and engineering techniques. Student writes at least five sentences.
|
3.5 to >2.0 pts
Competent
Student gives a good general description in which they discuss why the sacred space was built and the significance of the location.
|
2.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Student gives a general description that does not discuss why the sacred space was built, does not discuss the significance of the location, or is lacking in content.
|
0.0 pts
No credit
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHarmony with Nature
|
|
5.0 to >3.5 pts
Strong
Student provides a strong discussion of the site's or structure's relationship with nature. Student considers natural elements, astronomical features, and the cardinal directions. Student writes at least five sentences.
|
3.5 to >2.0 pts
Competent
Student provides a good discussion of the site's or structure's relationship with nature.
|
2.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Student gives provides some discussion of harmony with nature but discussion is lacking content.
|
0.0 pts
No credit
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSacred Objects
|
|
5.0 to >3.5 pts
Strong
Student provides strong discussion of the role of sacred objects and/or relics. Student writes at least five sentences.
|
3.5 to >2.0 pts
Competent
Student provides good discussion of the role of sacred objects and/or relics.
|
2.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Student provides some discussion of the role of sacred objects and/or relics.
|
0.0 pts
No credit
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse by Worshippers
|
|
5.0 to >3.5 pts
Strong
Student provides a strong discussion of the way the site was used by worshippers, both at the time of its conception and more recently. Student writes at least five sentences.
|
3.5 to >2.0 pts
Competent
Student provides a some discussion of the way the site was used by worshippers, both at the time of its conception and more recently.
|
2.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Discussion is lacking in content.
|
0.0 pts
No credit
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSimilarities to Chartres
|
|
7.0 to >5.6 pts
Strong
Student explains in detail two similarities between Chartres and chosen sacred space. Specific comparisons are expounded upon and described with exceptional detail. At least three sentences are written about each similarity.
|
5.6 to >4.2 pts
Good
Student explains two similarities between Chartres and chosen sacred space.
|
4.2 to >2.1 pts
Competent
Student identifies but does not explain two similarities between Chartres and chosen sacred space.
|
2.1 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Student comparison to Chartres is limited to only one sufficiently defended similarity.
|
0.0 pts
No Credit
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDifferences from Chartres
|
|
7.0 to >5.6 pts
Strong
Student explains in detail two differences between Chartres and chosen sacred space. Specific comparisons are expounded upon and described with exceptional detail. At least three sentences are written about each difference.
|
5.6 to >4.2 pts
Good
Student explains two differences between Chartres and chosen sacred space.
|
4.2 to >2.1 pts
Competent
Student identifies but does not explain two differences between Chartres and chosen sacred space.
|
2.1 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Student comparison to Chartres is limited to only one sufficiently defended difference.
|
0.0 pts
No Credit
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Requirements
Length, grammar, and research.
|
|
5.0 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
No errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. Students demonstrate proper style. Sources are listed at the end of the document. Students must use at two sources for their chosen sacred site. If using a website, an explanation of why the site should be trusted as a reliable source must be included.
|
4.0 to >2.5 pts
Competent
Some grammatical or writing errors but solid sources are given and defended.
|
2.5 to >1.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Sources are weak and/or explanation for using a source that appears weak is not provided and/or many grammatical errors.
|
1.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs substantial improvement
No sources provided and/or grammar and writing need substantial improvement.
|
0.0 pts
No credit
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Images
|
|
6.0 to >4.2 pts
Proficient
Student successfully includes a minimum of five images of their sacred space. Images are used successfully to demonstrate aspects discussed and are proportionally correct.
|
4.2 to >3.0 pts
Competent
Student meets most of the following criteria: Student successfully includes a minimum of five images of their sacred space. Images are used successfully to demonstrate aspects discussed and are proportionally correct.
|
3.0 to >0.0 pts
Needs improvement
Student includes some of the following: Student successfully includes a minimum of five images of their sacred space. Images are used successfully to demonstrate aspects discussed and are proportionally correct.
|
0.0 pts
No credit
|
|
6.0 pts
|
Sarahhhhh
rubric.docx
