|
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of human services interventions; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications regarding human services interventions.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of human services interventions.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in critical analysis.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
|
|
50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in human services interventions.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.
|
20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
|
|
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least 4 credible sources.
|
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates 3 credible sources.
|
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates 1-2 credible sources.
|
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates no credible sources.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
|
|
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
|
12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
|
|
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
|
|
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
|
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
|
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
|
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
|
|
20.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
|
30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
|
24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
|
12.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 350.0
|
Pinkpanthergurl3
Rubric.docx
