Writing First Draft
Superior Good Ok Needs work
|
Inquiry Question |
Question is strong well focused, and it is apparent how subsequent questions are related. Establishes significance of the inquiry.
|
Question is Good, but may be a bit broad or unfocused. |
Question is evident, but too general or specific, not that significant or merely stereotypical. |
Question is hard to determine or there is none |
|
Research |
Research ( at least 7-9 sources) is evident and sources are varied in terms of type and content. |
Research meets criteria, but may lack depth or variety |
There are not enough sources, or sources listed as Works Cited are not integrated into the essay |
Sources are too few or one source is overused. |
|
Evidence and Analysis |
Writer fully engages with source material in order to further the inquiry. There is ample evidence and analysis. Ideas and evidence are clear and well connected.
|
There is clear evidence and analysis but analysis may lack depth or not be as clearly related to ideas and evidence. |
Too much emphasis on summary and reporting as opposed to analysis and perspective of the writer. However, the paper is not entirely reporting |
Paper is merely a report of information without analysis or interpretation. |
|
Main idea |
The paper is clearly saying one thing- the perspective of the writer is clear. |
Main idea is clear but may lack depth or specificity |
Main idea is just somewhat apparent. |
There is no idea |
|
Organization |
Organization is clear and purposeful; writer takes care of the reader by providing context, transitions among ideas as well as within the paragraphs. Reader can follow clearly the path of inquiry.
|
Organization is clear and easy to follow, but may lack consistency and purpose. |
Paper is hard to follow at times and needs further development. |
Paper is too difficult to follow. |
|
Significance |
The reason why this matters is apparent. The writer makes the reader care. |
It may be clear that the answer matters to the writer, but there is a lack of stake in the answer for the reader. |
The significance of the idea is evident, but the writer hasn’t made the reader feel why it is important to the reader |
So what question isn’t addressed. |
|
Grammar Mechanics |
There is substantial control over grammar and mechanics. |
Very good control over grammar and mechanics with no surface errors that impede meaning. |
Grammar is inconsistent at times and occasionally ruptures meaning. |
Grammar is too inconsistent and ruptures meaning significantly. |
|
Style/Voice |
The writer has a clear voice that is present in the essay. Attention to language on the sentence level is apparent. |
Style and voice is consistent and clear. May lack some finesse. |
Style and voice is inconsistent or lacking. |
Voice is not apparent, and no attention is paid to language. |
|
Format: In- text Citations and Works Cited |
Paper follows MLA or APA format with properly cited in-text citations and a correctly formatted Works Cited page. |
Format followed with a few errors |
Format is inconsistent |
No formatting or completely wrong |
|
Revision |
|
|
|
|