Illusion of Success

Rubric

A1: Ethical Traits:

Competent

The discussion of 2 ethical traits the chosen leader has demonstrated is logical and well supported.

A2: Ethical Conduct:

Competent

The explanation of how the chosen leader has exhibited ethical conduct is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.

B: Dilemma Analysis:

Competent

The response compares how the dilemma found in the scenario could be approached from  both the deontological and consequentialist perspectives. The submission is logical and well supported.

C: Levels of Cognitive Moral Development:

Competent

The identification and explanation of which level of cognitive moral development is represented in the scenario is well reasoned and logical for at least four of the 5 given questions

D1: Preferred Ethical Lens:

Competent

The explanation of the preferred ethical lens is logical and relevant to the ELI results.

D1a: Different Settings:

Competent

The analysis of whether the candidate has the same preferred lens in different settings is well supported, and the ideas presented are logical.

D2: Primary Value and Classical Virtue:

Competent

The explanation of  both the primary value and classical virtue from the ELI is logical and relevant to the candidate’s ELI results.

D2a: Comparison to Values:

Competent

The comparison of the primary value from part D2 with 1 self-identified or personal value and the comparison of the classical virtue from part D2 with a different self-identified personal value are both logical and well supported.

D3: Blind Spot, Risk, Double Standard or Vice:

Competent

The description of the chosen blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from the candidate’s ELI is logical and relevant.

D3a: Making Better Ethical Decisions:

Competent

The discussion of  both of the 2 steps that could mitigate the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from part D3 in order to make better ethical decisions in the future is logical and well supported.

D4: Professional Use of ELI:

Competent

The discussion of how the information from the candidate’s ELI could be applied to an ethical situation in the workplace is logical, and the ideas presented are well supported.

E: ELI Results:

Competent

A copy of the PDF file with the results from the ELI is provided.

F: Sources

Competent

The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.

G: Professional Communication

Competent

This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding.