psychology

profilePreni-b
rubric.docx

sychosocial Development

Psychosocial Development

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle page/running head

3.0 pts

Full Marks

2.0 pts

Meh!

An obvious problem with either the title page OR the running head

1.0 pts

Yikes!

Obvious issues with the title page and the running head OR a major problem with either

0.5 pts

Poorly done

Only a few elements of title page and running head are provided.

0.0 pts

No Marks

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePdf

Please provide a full published version. Do not simply copy and paste from the web or any other source.

2.0 pts

Full Marks

1.0 pts

A version that has been copied and pasted

0.0 pts

No upload

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of study

What kind of study or review is it? Make sure to use words that peers would understand.

4.0 pts

Full Marks

2.0 pts

Missing some important information

0.0 pts

Missing or erroneous information

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipants

Who was studied?

3.0 pts

Full Marks

1.0 pts

Important information is missing

0.0 pts

Missing or erroneous information

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults

State the results of the statistical analysis. Use mostly numbers (that are meaningful), like "group A scored higher on the depression scale than group b. This is a prelude to the "explanation" of study.

3.0 pts

Clear explanation of results

2.0 pts

Results are unclear

1.0 pts

Results barely mentioned or not completely correct

0.0 pts

No results

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of study

(What does the title mean?) This is the biggest deal. Explain what you learned and what you would want other people to know from this study. Remember to use common language.

10.0 pts

Full Marks

Excellent and/or clear explanation

8.0 pts

Good, but...

A less-than-excellent explanation OR several grammatical mistakes take away from quality.

6.0 pts

Satisfactory explanation

Missing some coherency; Perhaps several grammatical issues that impact overall quality.

4.0 pts

Confusing or incomplete explanation

Perhaps many grammatical issues that impact coherency.

1.0 pts

Very poor explanation

0.0 pts

No explanation

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference

Make it perfect!

5.0 pts

Full Marks

4.0 pts

A minor error

A minor error, like including capital letters in the title, the authors' first names, no periods after the initials, not including the volume, issue, or full page numbers, missing italics in title or volume, not using a reverse indent, or not listing the name of the source.

3.0 pts

More than one minor error

1.0 pts

Doh!

A significant major error or many minor errors.

0.5 pts

Barely acceptable

Nor really acceptable, but did not want to assign a zero

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

Total Points: 30.0

Previous Next