How harmful challenges such as the fire challenge, the cinnamon challenge, choking challenge, and car surfing challenges are effecting families and themselves?

Some Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Literature Review

view longer description

30 pts

Topic area has been thoroughly reviewed. Evidence provided is clearly grounded in previous research. Sufficient number of empirical articles utilized to support resource objectives.

24 pts

Topic area has been reviewed. Evidence provided is clearly grounded in previous research. Sufficient number of empirical articles utilized to support resource objectives

18 pts

Topic area has been somewhat reviewed. Evidence provided is clearly grounded in previous research. insufficient number of empirical articles utilized to support resource objectives

6 pts

Topic area has been somewhat reviewed. Evidence is minimally grounded in relevant research. Insufficient number of empirical articles utilized to support objectives.

/ 30 pts

Bioecological Foundation

view longer description

30 pts

Bioecological theory is clearly described as the foundation of the project. Specific theoretical systems (micro-, meso-, exo-, macro-, and/or chrono-) are addressed in detail as they pertain to the topic and resource project focus. Theory information is appropriately cited.

24 pts

Bioecological theory is described as the foundation of the project. Specific theoretical systems (micro-, meso-, exo-, macro-, and/or chrono-) are mentioned as they pertain to the topic and resource project focus. Theory information is appropriately cited.

18 pts

Bioecological theory is mentioned as the foundation of the project. Specific theoretical systems (micro-, meso-, exo-, macro-, and/or chrono-) are not mentioned or theory information is not appropriately cited.

6 pts

Bioecological theory is not mentioned as the foundation of the project OR specific theoretical systems (micro-, meso-, exo-, macro-, and/or chrono-) are not mentioned and theory information is not appropriately cited.

/ 30 pts

Mechanics

view longer description

10 pts

Contains no spelling or grammatical errors, demonstrates creative use of language, uses citations to enhance written narrative, smooth transitions. Minimal quotations used (if any).

7 pts

Contains minor errors in spelling or grammar, is generally well-written, uses citations and quotations effectively.

4 pts

Contains multiple errors in spelling and grammar, writing style needs improvement, limited or poor use of citations, or excessive quoting of source material.

2 pts

Contains many errors in spelling and grammar, writing style needs improvement, limited or poor use of citations, and/or excessive quoting of source material.

/ 10 pts

APA Format/References/Citations

view longer description

5 pts

Paper includes sufficient references, including citations of original research (empirical articles) published in the last 10 years. References are of high quality. No errors in APA formatting. 3 pages in length.

3 pts

Paper includes sufficient references, including citations of original research (empirical articles) published in the last 10 years. References are of high quality. 1-2 errors in APA formatting. 3 pages in length.

2 pts

Minimal references or insufficient quality of references. 3-4 errors in APA formatting. 3 pages in length

1 pts

Lacks relevant references. Multiple errors in APA formatting. Less than 3 pages.

/ 5 pts

Total Points: 0