older person ageing health

Date:

Grade:

Criteria

HD (85-100%)

D (75-84%)

C (65-74%)

P (50-64%)

Z (<50%)

Person centred care is evident throughout essay and linked to the summary of your conversation (Appendix 1)

Clear evidence of a person-centred care approach throughout essay that is well articulated and clearly builds upon evidence from the conversation with the older person.

20 – 17 marks

Clear evidence of a person-centred care approach throughout essay with examples from the conversation with the older person.

16 -15 mark

Relatively clear evidence of a person-centred care approach that links to the conversation with the older person. Some omissions are noted.

14- 13 marks

Adequate evidence of a person centred care approach related to the conversation with the older person. Some issues are stated with a lack of clarity or logic with some omissions noted.

12- 10 marks

Unsatisfactory evidence of a person centred care approach throughout essay, or unrelated to the conversation with an older person.

9- 0 marks

Critical reflection that utilises your conversation summary to generate an accurate outline of the key issues for this older person

Clear critical reflection of the conversation is provided. Key issues for this older person are accurate and well-articulated supported by evidence from the conversation (Appendix 1).

20 – 17 marks

Clear critical reflection of the conversation is provided. Key issues for this older person are accurately stated and supported by evidence from the conversation (Appendix 1).

16 -15 mark

Relatively clear reflection of the conversation is provided. Key issues for the older person are accurately stated and supported by evidence from the conversation. Some omissions are noted. (Appendix 1).

14- 13 marks

Adequate reflection of the conversation is provided with key issues for this older person are supported by evidence from the conversation (Appendix 1). Some issues are stated with a lack of clarity, understanding or logic with some omissions noted.

12- 10 marks

Unsatisfactory reflection of the conversations is with unrelated, inaccurate, few or no key issues for this older person provided. Key issues are not supported by evidence from the conversation or are unrelated (Appendix 1).

9- 0 marks

Literature accurately and critically reviewed (template provided) in relation to the key issues for this older person. Academic literacy is evident throughout the essay

Clear analysis and critique of a relevant range of literature. Clarity of expression and structure is evident throughout the essay.

20 – 17 marks

Convincing analysis and critique of a relevant range of literature. Mainly spelling and grammatically error free.

16 -15 mark

Relatively clear analysis and critique of a relevant range of literature in accordance with the assessment guidelines. Occasional poor sentence or paragraph structure.

14- 13 marks

Adequate analysis and critique of literature in accordance with the assessment guidelines. Some issues Some issues are stated with a lack of clarity, understanding or logic with some omissions noted or reoccuring problems with sentence, paragraph and/or assessment structure.

12- 10 marks

Unsatisfactory analysis and critique of literature support is not relevant or person catered to the key issues or does not meet assessment guidelines. Or major problems are noted throughout with many spelling mistakes or grammatical errors

9- 0 marks

Evidence integrated from both your conversation and the literature to develop and justify an appropriate person-centred plan of care

Well-articulated integration of evidence from the conversation with the older person and 6 plus high-quality journals dated 2015 - 2020 that support person centred care planning.

20 – 17 marks

Clear integration of evidence from the discussion with the older person and/or 6 plus high-quality journals dated 2015 - 2020 that support person centred care planning.

16 -15 mark

Relatively clear use of evidence from the discussion with the older person and or 6 high quality journals dated 2015 - 2020 that support person centred care planning. Some omissions are noted.

14- 13 marks

Adequate use of information from the discussion with the older person and high quality journals less than six that support person centred care planning. Some issues are stated with a lack of clarity, understanding or logic with some omissions noted

12- 10 marks

Unsatisfactory use of information from the discussion with the older person. Minimal journal support or not within specific journal dates support person centred care planning.

9- 0 marks

Implementation of the plan of care outlined and clearly related to the specific setting of care for this older person.

A well-articulated clear outline of the plans implementation that incorporates older person preference, personal, location and access to services. A multidisciplinary approach to care is described. Challenges to implementation are Identified and thoughtful practical strategies to overcome challenges discussed.

20 – 17 marks

Clear outline of the plans implementation that incorporates older person preference, personal, location and access to services. A multidisciplinary approach to care is described. Challenges to implementation are Identified and thoughtful practical strategies to overcome challenges discussed.

16 -15 mark

Relatively clear outline of the plans implementation that incorporates older person preference, personal, location and access to services. A multidisciplinary approach to care is described. Challenges to implementation are Identified and strategies to overcome challenges discussed. Some omissions are noted.

14- 13 marks

Adequate outline of the plans implementation that incorporates older person preference, personal circumstance, location and access to services. A multidisciplinary approach to care is described. Some issues are stated with a lack of clarity, understanding or logic with some omissions noted

12- 10 marks

Unsatisfactory outline the plans implementation. Care plan is unrelated to older person conversation, unachievable or does not incorporate the older persons preference, personal circumstance, location and how the client will access the suggested services is not clear in the plan.

9- 0 marks