Coaching Philosophy Paper
SMGT 621
Coaching Philosophy Paper: Final Grading Rubric
200 Points
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Content
60 points |
55 to 60 points The content of the paper demonstrates thoughtful analysis of the student’s personal philosophy supported by personal experience and class readings/assignments. |
50 to 54 points The content of the paper demonstrates an analysis of the student’s personal philosophy and is generally supported by personal experience and class readings/assignments; however, some areas could have been more developed. |
1 to 49 points The content of the paper demonstrates vague and incomplete analysis of the student’s personal philosophy; there is little support given in the form of personal experience and/or class readings/assignments. |
0 points Not present |
|
Coaching Practice 40 points |
37 to 40 points There is a thorough perspective present regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will inform all aspects of his/her coaching practice. |
34 to 36 points There is a general perspective present regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will inform all aspects of his/her coaching practice; however, some areas could have been more developed. |
1 to 33 points There is a vague perspective present regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will inform all aspects of his/her coaching practice. |
0 points Not present |
|
Biblical Worldview 40 points |
37 to 40 points A biblical worldview regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will integrate with the student’s convictions is included. |
34 to 36 points A biblical worldview regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will integrate with the student’s convictions is included; however, this could have been more developed and/or there are some gaps in logic. |
1 to 33 points A biblical worldview regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will integrate with the student’s convictions is included; however, this section is vague and/or there are several gaps in logic. |
0 points Not present |
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Current APA Format 20 points |
18 to 20 points Current APA guidelines are followed. |
17 points Current APA guidelines are followed with few errors. |
1 to 16 points Current APA guidelines followed with frequent errors or not followed. |
0 points Not present |
|
Spelling and Grammar 20 points
|
18 to 20 points Assignment is well-written with correct word choices, good phrasing, few grammatical errors, and few spelling errors. |
17 points Assignment is well-written with only a few errors with word choice, phrasing, grammar, and/or spelling; errors do not distract or detract from the overall meaning |
1 to 16 points The assignment is poorly written. There are numerous errors with word choices, phrasing, grammar, and/or spelling; errors distract and detract from the overall meaning. |
0 points Not present |
|
Page Length and References 20 points |
18 to 20 points · The assignment is 10–15 pages. · A minimum of 10 peer-reviewed references are used in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. |
17 points · The assignment is 8–9 pages and/or · A total of 8–9 peer-reviewed references are used in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. |
1 to 16 points · The assignment is 5–7 pages and/or · A total of 5–7 peer-reviewed references are used in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible. |
0 points Not present |