|
Categories
|
5- Exemplary
|
4- Above Standards
|
3- Meets Standards
|
2- Approaching Standards
|
1- Below Standards
|
|
Originality of Thought
|
Creates unique and original concepts within assignments that expand upon the readings and the form.
|
Creates unique and original concepts with assignments that correlate to the standards contained in readings and the current form.
|
Mimics the assignment and reading but does not offer much in the way of originality of thought.
|
Creates possibly derivative concepts that offer little in terms of originality of thought.
|
Demonstrates a lack of understanding related to the assignment.
|
|
Clarity of Thought
|
Creates a well-structured and organized response to the various creative assignments that expands beyond the original directive.
|
Creates a well-structured and organized response to the various creative assignments that goes slightly beyond the original directive.
|
Creates a well-structured and organized response to the various creative assignments that meets the directive.
|
Creates a somewhat structured and organized response to the various creative assignments that almost meets the directive.
|
Creates an un-structured and disorganized response to the various creative assignments that does not meet the directive.
|
|
Following directives from assignment
|
Understands, meets and enhances the unique directives for each assignment though the use of creative ingenuity and historical fact.
|
Understands, meets and enhances the unique directives for each assignment.
|
Understands and meets the unique directives for each assignment.
|
Seems to lack a complete understanding of the unique directives for each assignment.
|
Does not understand the unique directives for each assignment.
|
|
Use of concepts from past assignments, readings, videos and presentations
|
Synthesizes historical and creative resonance of the art form though use of numerous past examples enhanced by original thought.
|
Synthesizes the historical and creative resonance of the art form though use of numerous past examples.
|
Synthesizes the historical and creative resonance of the art form though use of past examples.
|
Approaching the use of historical and creative resonance of the art form though use of past examples.
|
Inability to synthesizethe historical and creative resonance of the art form though use of past examples.
|
|
Ability to examine the collaborative nature of musical theatre from various perspectives
|
Understands and appreciates all elements of musical theatre and examines each assignment from various perspectives like design or choreography.
|
Understands all elements of musical theatre and examines each assignment from various perspectives like design or choreography.
|
Understands all elements of musical theatre and examines each assignment from at least two perspectives.
|
Seems to lack completeunderstanding of all elements of musical theatre and examines the assignment from only one perspective.
|
Does not understand all elements of musical theatre and lacks examination from more than one perspective.
|
|
Grammar and Spelling
|
Uses sophisticated language that contains no grammatical errors and offers well-structured insightful conclusions.
|
Uses language that contains no grammatical errors and offers well-structured insightful conclusions.
|
Uses language that contains no grammatical errors and offers structured conclusions.
|
Uses language that contains grammatical errors and offers unstructured conclusions.
|
Contains numerous grammatical errors and a lack of structure within the assignment.
|