Development Newsletter
5/30/26, 1:34 PM
Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc
Development Newsletter (Obj. 3.1 and 3.3) - Rubric Total 130 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Description
Description of physical,
cognitive, and
socioemotional
development in the
selected period.
0 points
The newsletter omits or
incompletely describes the
physical, cognitive, and
socioemotional
development in the
selected period. The
newsletter does not
demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
21.13 points
The newsletter
inadequately describes the
physical, cognitive, and
socioemotional
development in the
selected period. The
newsletter demonstrates a
poor understanding of the
topic.
24.38 points
The newsletter adequately
describes the physical,
cognitive, and
socioemotional
development in the
selected period. The
newsletter demonstrates a
basic understanding of the
topic.
27.63 points
The newsletter clearly
describes the physical,
cognitive, and
socioemotional
development in the
selected period. The
newsletter demonstrates
an understanding that
extends beyond the
surface of the topic.
32.5 points
The newsletter expertly
describes the physical,
cognitive, and
socioemotional
development in the
selected period. The
newsletter demonstrates
an exceptional
understanding of the topic.
Factors
Explanation of factors
(minimum of two) that are
impactful and specific to
the selected
developmental period (for
example, Attachment in
Infancy, Parenting Styles in
Childhood, Bullying in
Adolescence, Marriage in
Early Adulthood, Stigmas
Associated With the Elderly
in Late Adulthood).
0 points
The newsletter omits or
incompletely explains a
minimum of two factors
that are impactful and
specific to the selected
developmental period. The
newsletter does not
demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
21.13 points
The newsletter
inadequately explains a
minimum of two factors
that are impactful and
specific to the selected
developmental period. The
newsletter demonstrates a
poor understanding of the
topic.
24.38 points
The newsletter adequately
explains a minimum of two
factors that are impactful
and specific to the selected
developmental period. The
newsletter demonstrates a
basic understanding of the
topic.
27.63 points
The newsletter clearly
explains a minimum of two
factors that are impactful
and specific to the selected
developmental period. The
newsletter demonstrates
an understanding that
extends beyond the
surface of the topic.
32.5 points
The newsletter expertly
explains a minimum of two
factors that are impactful
and specific to the selected
developmental period. The
newsletter demonstrates
an exceptional
understanding of the topic.
Development Theories
Explanation and
application of a minimum
of two developmental
theories (e.g., Piaget,
Erikson, Kohlberg, Bowlby,
Freud, Bandura,
Bronfenbrenner).
0 points
The newsletter omits or
incompletely explains and
applies a minimum of two
developmental theories.
The newsletter does not
demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
25.35 points
The newsletter
inadequately explains and
applies a minimum of two
developmental theories.
The newsletter
demonstrates a poor
understanding of the topic.
29.25 points
The newsletter adequately
explains and applies a
minimum of two
developmental theories.
The newsletter
demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topic.
33.15 points
The newsletter clearly
explains and applies a
minimum of two
developmental theories.
The newsletter
demonstrates an
understanding that
extends beyond the
surface of the topic.
39 points
The newsletter expertly
explains and applies a
minimum of two
developmental theories.
The newsletter
demonstrates an
exceptional understanding
of the topic.
Layout
Contributes to the overall
message.
0 points
The layout is cluttered,
confusing, and does not
use spacing, headings, and
subheadings to enhance
the readability. The text is
extremely difficult to read
with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts,
and inappropriate
contrasting colors. Poor
use of headings,
subheadings, indentations,
or bold formatting is
evident.
4.23 points
The layout shows some
structure but appears
cluttered and busy or
distracting with large gaps
of white space or a
distracting background.
Overall readability is
difficult due to lengthy
paragraphs, too many
different fonts, dark or
busy background, overuse
of bold, or lack of
appropriate indentations
of text.
4.88 points
The layout uses horizontal
and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes,
the fonts are easy to read,
but in a few places, the use
of fonts, italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy
background detracts and
does not enhance
readability.
5.52 points
The layout background and
text complement each
other and enable the
content to be easily read.
The fonts are easy to read,
and point size varies
appropriately for headings
and text.
6.5 points
The layout is visually
pleasing and contributes to
the overall message with
appropriate use of
headings, subheadings,
and white space. Text is
appropriate in length for
the target audience and to
the point. The background
and colors enhance the
readability of the text.
Language Use and
Audience Awareness
Includes sentence
construction, word choice,
etc.
0 points
Inappropriate word choice
and lack of variety in
language use are evident.
Writer appears to be
unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates
writer either does not
apply figures of speech or
4.23 points
Some distracting
inconsistencies in language
choice (register) or word
choice are present. The
writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of
speech appropriately.
4.88 points
Language is appropriate to
the targeted audience for
the most part.
5.52 points
The writer is clearly aware
of audience, uses a variety
of appropriate vocabulary
for the target audience,
and uses figures of speech
to communicate clearly.
6.5 points
The writer uses a variety of
sentence constructions,
figures of speech, and
word choice in distinctive
and creative ways that are
appropriate to purpose,
discipline, and scope.
5/30/26, 1:34 PM
Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc
uses them inappropriately.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive and
impede meaning. Incorrect
language choice or
sentence structure errors
are found throughout.
4.23 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies in
language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.
4.88 points
Occasional mechanical
errors are present.
Language choice is
generally appropriate.
Varied sentence structure
is attempted.
5.52 points
Few mechanical errors are
present. Suitable language
choice and sentence
structure are used.
6.5 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are
used throughout.
Citations
Includes APA style in-text
citation and APA reference
list for a minimum of two
scholarly sources.
0 points
Neither in-text citation nor
reference list were present.
4.23 points
In-text citations and/or
reference list were present,
but not properly formatted
in APA. Cites less than two
scholarly sources or
sources cited are not
scholarly.
4.88 points
Both in-text citations and
reference list were present,
but with obvious
formatting errors. A
minimum of two scholarly
sources were cited.
5.52 points
Both in-text citations and
reference list were
included. APA formatting
was fully used with only
minor errors. A minimum
of two scholarly sources
were cited.
6.5 points
Both in-text citations and
reference list were
included. APA formatting
was fully used with no
errors. A minimum of two
scholarly sources were
cited.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.