Education STEWARDSHIP STANDARDS & GUIDELINES ASSIGNMENT

7/23/25, 10:49 AM

Page 1 of 2about:srcdoc

Data Stewardship Standards and Guidelines - Rubric Total 80 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficienet 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target

Goal for Alignment

Goal for the alignment of

both clinical and public

data standards

0 points

A goal for the alignment of

both clinical and public

data standards is not

included.

5.72 points

A goal for the alignment of

both clinical and public

data standards is

incomplete or otherwise

deficient.

6.6 points

A goal for the alignment of

both clinical and public

data standards is present,

but only minimal detail or

support is provided.

7.48 points

A goal for the alignment of

both clinical and public

data standards is provided

with appropriate details

and support.

8.8 points

A goal for the alignment of

both clinical and public

data standards is

thoroughly explored and

clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Clinical and Public Health

Data Use Differences

Differences between

clinical and public health

data use including how this

partnership will minimize

those disparities

0 points

Differences between

clinical and public health

data use including how this

partnership will minimize

those disparities are not

included.

5.72 points

Differences between

clinical and public health

data use including how this

partnership will minimize

those disparities are

incomplete or otherwise

deficient.

6.6 points

Differences between

clinical and public health

data use including how this

partnership will minimize

those disparities are

present, but only minimal

detail or support is

provided.

7.48 points

Differences between

clinical and public health

data use including how this

partnership will minimize

those disparities are

provided with appropriate

details and support.

8.8 points

Differences between

clinical and public health

data use including how this

partnership will minimize

those disparities are

thoroughly explored and

clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Clinical and Public Health

Data Use Similarities

Similarities between clinical

and public health data use

including how this

partnership will capitalize

on those parallels

0 points

Similarities between clinical

and public health data use

including how this

partnership will capitalize

on those parallels are not

included.

5.72 points

Similarities between clinical

and public health data use

including how this

partnership will capitalize

on those parallels are

incomplete or otherwise

deficient.

6.6 points

Similarities between clinical

and public health data use

including how this

partnership will capitalize

on those parallels are

present, but only minimal

detail or support is

provided.

7.48 points

Similarities between clinical

and public health data use

including how this

partnership will capitalize

on those parallels are

provided with appropriate

details and support.

8.8 points

Similarities between clinical

and public health data use

including how this

partnership will capitalize

on those parallels are

thoroughly explored and

clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Proposed Standards and

Guidelines

Proposal for new data

stewardship standards and

guidelines

0 points

A proposal for new data

stewardship standards and

guidelines is not included.

5.72 points

A proposal for new data

stewardship standards and

guidelines under the

merger is incomplete or

otherwise deficient.

6.6 points

A proposal for new data

stewardship standards and

guidelines under the

merger is present, but only

minimal detail or support

is provided.

7.48 points

A proposal for new data

stewardship standards and

guidelines under the

merger is provided with

appropriate details and

support.

8.8 points

A proposal for new data

stewardship standards and

guidelines under the

merger is thoroughly

explored and clearly

explained with relevant

details and support.

Action Plan

Action plan, including steps

for standardization and

process management,

measures to maintain

consistency, privacy

parameters, and plans for

data collection and storage

0 points

An action plan, including

steps for standardization

and process management,

measures to maintain

consistency, privacy

parameters, and plans for

data collection and

storage, is not included.

6.24 points

An action plan, including

steps for standardization

and process management,

measures to maintain

consistency, privacy

parameters, and plans for

data collection and

storage, is incomplete or

otherwise deficient.

7.2 points

An action plan, including

steps for standardization

and process management,

measures to maintain

consistency, privacy

parameters, and plans for

data collection and

storage, is present, but

only minimal detail or

support is provided.

8.16 points

An action plan, including

steps for standardization

and process management,

measures to maintain

consistency, privacy

parameters, and plans for

data collection and

storage, is provided with

appropriate details and

support.

9.6 points

An action plan, including

steps for standardization

and process management,

measures to maintain

consistency, privacy

parameters, and plans for

data collection and

storage, is thoroughly

explored and clearly

explained with relevant

details and support.

Collaboration Effects

Effects of the collaboration

on patients, practitioners,

and public and private

health care organizations

0 points

The effects of the

collaboration on patients,

practitioners, and public

and private health care

organizations are not

included.

5.72 points

The effects of the

collaboration on patients,

practitioners, and public

and private health care

organizations are

incomplete or otherwise

6.6 points

The effects of the

collaboration on patients,

practitioners, and public

and private health care

organizations are present,

but only minimal detail or

7.48 points

The effects of the

collaboration on patients,

practitioners, and public

and private health care

organizations are provided

with appropriate details

8.8 points

The effects of the

collaboration on patients,

practitioners, and public

and private health care

organizations are

thoroughly explored and

7/23/25, 10:49 AM

Page 2 of 2about:srcdoc

deficient. support is provided. and support. clearly explained with

relevant details and

support.

Advantages of

Partnership

Explanation of how this

partnership will strengthen

the infrastructure and

interdisciplinary goals for

health IS/IT

0 points

An explanation of how this

partnership will strengthen

the infrastructure and

interdisciplinary goals for

health IS/IT is not included.

5.72 points

An explanation of how this

partnership will strengthen

the infrastructure and

interdisciplinary goals for

health IS/IT is incomplete

or otherwise deficient.

6.6 points

An explanation of how this

partnership will strengthen

the infrastructure and

interdisciplinary goals for

health IS/IT is present, but

only minimal detail or

support is provided.

7.48 points

An explanation of how this

partnership will strengthen

the infrastructure and

interdisciplinary goals for

health IS/IT is provided

with appropriate details

and support.

8.8 points

An explanation of how this

partnership will strengthen

the infrastructure and

interdisciplinary goals for

health IS/IT is thoroughly

explored and clearly

explained with relevant

details and support.

Evidence

Selects and integrates

evidence to support and

advance position/purpose;

considers other

perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the

thesis, position, or purpose

is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective

of the writer.

6.24 points

Evidence is limited or

irrelevant. The

interpretation of other

perspectives is superficial

or incorrect.

7.2 points

Evidence is used but is

insufficient or of limited

relevance. Simplistic

explanation or integration

of other perspectives is

present.

8.16 points

Relevant evidence that

includes other perspectives

is used.

9.6 points

Specific and appropriate

evidence is included.

Relevant perspectives of

others are clearly

considered.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar,

language use

0 points

Errors in grammar or

syntax are pervasive and

impede meaning. Incorrect

language choice or

sentence structure errors

are found throughout.

2.6 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors are

present. Inconsistencies in

language choice or

sentence structure are

recurrent.

3 points

Occasional mechanical

errors are present.

Language choice is

generally appropriate.

Varied sentence structure

is attempted.

3.4 points

Few mechanical errors are

present. Suitable language

choice and sentence

structure are used.

4 points

No mechanical errors are

present. Appropriate

language choice and

sentence structure are

used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style,

such as APA, MLA, etc., for

college, subject, and level;

documents sources using

citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography,

etc., appropriate to

assignment and discipline.

0 points

Appropriate format is not

used. No documentation of

sources is provided.

2.6 points

Appropriate format is

attempted, but some

elements are missing.

Frequent errors in

documentation of sources

are evident.

3 points

Appropriate format and

documentation are used,

although there are some

obvious errors.

3.4 points

Appropriate format and

documentation are used

with only minor errors.

4 points

No errors in formatting or

documentation are

present.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.