| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| | | Clinical Field Experience B: Identifying Student Challenges |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Summary Content: Mentor Teacher Conversation, Strategies, and Strategy Rationales | 35.0% | Not addressed. | Submission weakly summarizes the initial conversation with the mentor teacher, differentiation and engagement strategies, and intervention strategy rationales. Key points are insufficient or irrelevant. | Submission minimally summarizes the initial conversation with the mentor teacher, differentiation and engagement strategies, and intervention strategy rationales. Not all required elements are included, or key points are lacking substance or relevance. | Submission adequately summarizes the initial conversation with the mentor teacher, differentiation and engagement strategies, and intervention strategy rationales. All required elements are included. Points are general, but appropriate. | Submission proficiently summarizes the initial conversation with the mentor teacher, differentiation and engagement strategies, and intervention strategy rationales with discerning details. All required elements are fully addressed. |
| Summary Content: Strategies, Reflection, and Applications to Future Practice | 45.0% | Not addressed. | Math lesson or activity strategies reflection and applications to future practice are incomplete or unrelated to what was described in the summary. | Math lesson or activity strategies reflection and applications to future practice are unrealistic or underdeveloped. | Math lesson or activity strategies reflection and applications to future practice are basic, useful, and appropriate for students. | Math lesson or activity strategies reflection and applications to future practice are insightful, realistic, and clearly consider the needs of students. |
| Organization | 10.0% | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the summary is widely outside of the required word count. | The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the required word count. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within a reasonable range of the required word count. | The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the required word count. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 10.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
p07141980
Rubric_ClinicalFieldExperienceBMarch.xlsx
