|
|
Exemplary (4)
|
Accomplished (3)
|
Developing (2)
|
Unsatisfactory (1)
|
|
MECHANICS
|
The work consistently shows proper punctuation, spelling, and grammar. Writing is very well organized, and word choice is precise.
|
The work usually shows proper punctuation, spelling, and grammar. Writing is adequately organized, and word choice is also adequate.
|
The work shows uneven punctuation, spelling, and grammar. Writing is unevenly organized, and word choice is ambiguous.
|
The work shows inadequate punctuation, spelling, and grammar. Writing is disorganized, and word choice sometimes inappropriate.
|
|
ASSIGNMENT COMPONENTS
|
The work thoroughly addresses all assigned components.
|
The work adequately addresses all assigned components.
|
The work unevenly addresses the assigned components.
|
The work inadequately addresses the assigned components.
|
|
Critical Thinking
|
|
KNOWLEDGE AND COMPREHENSION (understanding the basics)
|
The work consistently demonstrates clear, accurate, detailed and comprehensive understanding of the relevant facts /data/ theories/ terms.
|
The work demonstrates an adequate understanding of the relevant facts / data / theories/ terms.
|
The work demonstrates an uneven understanding of the relevant facts / data / theories/ terms.
|
The work demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the relevant facts / data / theories/ terms.
|
|
APPLICATION AND ANALYSIS
(attaining the concept)
|
The work demonstrates confident ability to work with the key concepts/information/process/theory presented in the course -- applying or extending them to the problems/context of case study—making predictions, recognizing meanings, drawing inferences, analyzing patterns and component parts, communicating insightful contrasts and comparisons.
|
The work demonstrates adequate ability to work with the key concepts / information / process / theory -- applying or extending them the problems/ contexts of the case study, making predictions, recognizing meanings, drawing inferences, analyzing patterns and component parts, communicating insightful contrasts and comparisons.
|
The work demonstrates uneven ability to work with the key concepts / information / process / theory --applying or extending them with mixed success to the problems/contexts of the case study, making predictions, recognizing hidden meanings, drawing inferences, analyzing patterns and component parts, communicating insightful contrasts and comparisons.
|
The work demonstrates extremely limited ability to work with the key concepts / information / process / theory --applying or extending them with very limited success to problems/context of the case study, making predictions, recognizing meanings, drawing inferences, analyzing patterns and component parts, communicating insightful contrasts and comparisons.
|
|
SYNTHESIZING AND EVALUATING (going beyond the given)
|
The work demonstrates surprising/insightful ability to take ideas / theories / processes / principles further into new territory, broader generalizations, hidden meanings and implications as well as to assess discriminatively the value, credibility and power of these ideas (etc) in order to decide on well-considered choices and opinions.
|
The work demonstrates adequate ability to take ideas / theories / processes / principles further into new territory, broader generalizations, hidden meanings and implications as well as to assess discriminatively the value,
credibility and power of these ideas (etc) in order to decide on well-considered choices and opinions.
|
The work demonstrates uneven and superficial ability to take ideas / theories / processes / principles further into new
territory, broader generalizations, hidden meanings and implications as well as a limited ability to assess
discriminatively the value, credibility and power of these ideas (etc) in order to decide on well-considered choices and
opinions.
|
The work demonstrates little ability to take ideas / theories / processes / principles further into new territory, broader
generalizations, hidden meanings and implications as a limited and superficial ability to assess
discriminatively the value, credibility and power of these ideas (etc) in order to decide on well-considered choices and
opinions.
|
jameohxlzb
Rubric-CaseStudy1jakia.docx
0
