Case 4

profilece753d
Rubric_Case4.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code
FIN-650 FIN-650-O500 Benchmark - Mini Case 4 30.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Question A 15.0% Answer to question A is not included. Answer to question A is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question A is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question A is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question A is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question B 15.0% Answer to question B is not included. Answer to question B is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question B is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question B is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question B is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question C 15.0% Answer to question C is not included. Answer to question C is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question C is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question C is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question C is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question D 15.0% Answer to question D is not included. Answer to question D is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question D is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question D is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question D is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Ethical Issues and Standards (C. 4.2) 30.0% Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical standards within the organization is not included. Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical standards within the organization is incomplete or incorrect. Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical standards within the organization is included but lacks explanation and supporting details and examples. Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical standards within the organization is complete and includes supporting details and examples. Report discussing potential ethical issues that may arise from expansion and opportunities to promote ethical standards within the organization is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details and examples.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage 100%