Mini Case 3

profilece753d
Rubric_Case3.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code
FIN-650 FIN-650-O500 CLC - Mini Case 3 and Presentation 30.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Question A 13.0% Answer to question A is not included. Answer to question A is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question A is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question A is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question A is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question B 12.0% Answer to question B is not included. Answer to question B is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question B is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question B is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question B is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question C 12.0% Answer to question C is not included. Answer to question C is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question C is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question C is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question C is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question D 12.0% Answer to question D is not included. Answer to question D is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question D is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question D is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question D is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question E 12.0% Answer to question E is not included. Answer to question E is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question E is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question E is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question E is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Question F 12.0% Answer to question F is not included. Answer to question F is incomplete or incorrect. Answer to question F is included but lacks explanation and relevant supporting details. Answer to question F is complete and includes relevant supporting details. Answer to question F is extremely thorough and supported with substantial relevant details.
Presentation of Content 10.0% The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Speaker Notes 2.0% Speaker notes are not included. Speaker notes are incomplete or incorrect. Speaker notes are included but lack alignment with results of analysis or lack relevant details and explanation. Speaker notes are complete, align with results of the analysis, and include relevant details and explanation. Speaker notes are extremely thorough and expertly crafted.
Layout 5.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage 100%