Major Psychological Movements

Benchmark – Historical Timeline: Major Psychological Movements - Rubric Total 250

points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Introduction (B) (B)

C.2.1: Discuss the history

and development of the

theories of Psychoanalysis,

Behaviorism, and

Humanistic/Transpersonal/Existential

(HTE) Psychology. (C2.1)

0 points

Fails to introduce the topic

effectively; missing or

unclear thesis, lack of

historical context for the

major theories. Omits

introduction or provides an

incoherent statement.

29.2 points

Weak introduction with

limited historical context;

the thesis is present, but

lacks clarity and depth

regarding psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology.

32.8 points

Introduction is clear but

lacks sufficient depth;

thesis and historical

context of psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology are adequate

but not compelling.

36.4 points

Clearly introduces the topic

with good organization;

thesis is strong and

historical context of

psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology is well-

explained, setting up the

paper effectively.

40 points

Provides a comprehensive,

engaging introduction;

includes a strong thesis

and rich historical context

of psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology that piques

interest and provides a

solid foundation for the

paper.

Psychoanalysis/Psychodynamic

Theory

0 points

Lacks understanding;

important details about

psychoanalysis/psychodynamic

theory are missing or are

unclear. Misrepresents or

omits primary theorists

and concepts.

29.2 points

Shows limited

understanding of

psychoanalysis/psychodynamic

theory; some key theorists

and concepts are

mentioned, but not well-

explained; lacks crucial

historical details.

32.8 points

Basic understanding of

psychoanalysis/psychodynamic

theory with some

important points covered;

lacks in-depth analysis and

detailed discussion of

primary tenets and key

theorists like Freud, Jung,

and Adler.

36.4 points

Good discussion with clear

understanding of primary

tenets, key theorists (e.g.,

Freud, Jung, Adler), and

historical aspects of

psychoanalysis/psychodynamic

theory; minor points may

need more depth, but

overall solid

comprehension.

40 points

Detailed discussion,

demonstrating an excellent

understanding of primary

tenets, key theorists (e.g.,

Freud, Jung, Adler), and

historical perspectives of

psychoanalysis/psychodynamic

theory; includes precise

background, context, and

insightful explanations.

Behaviorism 0 points

Inadequate discussion of

behaviorism; fails to cover

important concepts or

theorists. Misinterprets

theoretical underpinnings

and key concepts.

29.2 points

Covers some key concepts

and theorists of

behaviorism, but lacks

depth and clarity;

theoretical roots are

weakly addressed or

misrepresented.

32.8 points

Basic coverage of key

concepts and theorists of

behaviorism; lacks depth

or some important points;

theoretical aspects are

mentioned, but not fully

explored; key theorists

such as Watson and

Skinner are discussed.

36.4 points

Clear and well-organized

discussion of theoretical

underpinnings, key

concepts, and important

theorists of behaviorism;

explanations are accurate

and informative, providing

a good understanding of

theorists like Watson and

Skinner.

40 points

Provides a thorough

discussion with excellent

insights into theoretical

underpinnings, key

concepts, and important

theorists of behaviorism;

integrates a deep

understanding and

detailed analysis of

contributions from key

figures like Watson and

Skinner.

Humanistic/Transpersonal/Existential

(HTE) Psychology

0 points

Lacks clear explanation

and fails to identify

important tenets or

differences within

humanistic/transpersonal/existential

(HTE) psychology.

Misrepresents or omits key

ideas and theorists.

29.2 points

Provides limited discussion

of tenets and key theorists

of

humanistic/transpersonal/existential

(HTE) psychology; lacks

clarity and depth; fails to

sufficiently differentiate

between theorists like

Maslow, Rogers, and

Frankl.

32.8 points

Basic discussion of

humanistic/transpersonal/existential

(HTE) psychology; some

important points or

differences within the

movement are weak or

missing; discussion is

somewhat generalized

without distinguishing

specific contributions of

theorists like Maslow,

Rogers, and Frankl.

36.4 points

Clear discussion of tenets

and key theorists of

humanistic/transpersonal/existential

(HTE) psychology; explains

differences within the

movement well; provides

informative comparisons

and contexts for theorists

like Maslow, Rogers, and

Frankl.

40 points

Comprehensive

explanation of tenets and

key theorists of

humanistic/transpersonal/existential

(HTE) psychology; excellent

insight into the differences

within the movement;

provides in-depth and

nuanced perspectives on

the contributions of each

theorist and sub-field

(Maslow, Rogers, Frankl).

Synthesis & Conclusion

(B) (B)

C.2.2: Synthesize the

theories of Psychoanalysis,

Behaviorism, and HTE

Psychology. (C2.2)

0 points

Inadequate synthesis; lacks

clear timeline or

connections between

psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology movements;

29.2 points

Limited synthesis of

psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology movements;

lacks clear connections or

timeline; conclusion is

32.8 points

Basic synthesis of

psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology; some

connections and

transitions are unclear or

36.4 points

Good synthesis of

psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology movements;

clear timeline and

organized discussion;

40 points

Thoroughly synthesizes

movements of

psychoanalysis,

behaviorism, and HTE

psychology into a cohesive

timeline, demonstrating a

poor or missing conclusion.

Fails to integrate historical

progression.

weak and does not project

future perspectives

lacking; timeline is present,

but not fully developed; a

basic concluding statement

is provided.

demonstrates how one

movement led to or

influenced another; a good

concluding statement on

future perspectives is

present.

clear understanding of the

development process;

includes insightful

connections between

movements and a strong

concluding statement on

future perspectives.

Thesis Development and

Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible

overall purpose or

organizing claim.

18.25 points

Thesis is insufficiently

developed or vague.

Purpose is not clear.

20.5 points

Thesis is apparent and

appropriate to purpose.

22.75 points

Thesis is clear and

forecasts the development

of the paper. Thesis is

descriptive and reflective

of the arguments and

appropriate to the

purpose.

25 points

Thesis is comprehensive

and contains the essence

of the paper. Thesis

statement makes the

purpose of the paper clear.

Mechanics of Writing 0 points

Surface errors are

pervasive enough that they

impede communication of

meaning. Inappropriate

word choice or sentence

construction is used.

9.13 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors distract

the reader. Inconsistencies

in language choice

(register) or word choice

are present. Sentence

structure is correct, but not

varied.

10.25 points

Some mechanical errors or

typos are present, but they

are not overly distracting

to the reader. Correct and

varied sentence structure

and audience-appropriate

language are employed.

11.38 points

Prose is largely free of

mechanical errors,

although a few may be

present. The writer uses a

variety of effective

sentence structures and

figures of speech.

12.5 points

Writer is clearly in

command of standard,

written, academic English.

APA Format 0 points

Required format is rarely

followed correctly. No

reference page is included.

No in-text citations are

used.

9.13 points

Required format elements

are missing or incorrect. A

lack of control with

formatting is apparent.

Reference page is present.

However, in-text citations

are inconsistently used.

10.25 points

Required format is

generally correct. However,

errors are present (e.g.,

font, cover page, margins,

and in-text citations).

Reference page is included

and lists sources used in

the paper. Sources are

appropriately documented

though some errors are

present.

11.38 points

Required format is used,

but minor errors are

present (e.g., headings and

direct quotes). Reference

page is present and

includes all cited sources.

Documentation is

appropriate and citation

style is usually correct.

12.5 points

The document is correctly

formatted. In-text citations

and a reference page are

complete and correct. The

documentation of cited

sources is free of error.

© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.