Order 1324793: Immigration deportation in the U.S (current) based on Aristotle′s theory
|
|
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Criteria |
Score of 1 |
Score of 2 |
Score of 3 |
Score of 4 |
Score of 5 |
|
Introduction & Conclusion
Weight 10.00% |
Missing introduction and conclusion |
Has vague or missing introduction or conclusion |
Contains both an introduction and conclusion |
Provides an informative introduction and conclusion |
Introduction provides a thesis statement and lays out structure of paper. Strong conclusion sums up the argument. |
|
Burden of Proof
Weight 30.00% |
Omits concrete examples. |
Uses irrelevant or inaccurate information |
Includes accurate facts, examples, and details. |
Includes accurate and relevant facts, examples, and details, but may not support all claims sufficiently. |
Richly supports argument with accurate and relevant facts, examples, and details. |
|
Organization
Weight 30.00% |
Attempts to complete the task, but demonstrates a major weakness in organization. |
Essay lacks focus: some structure, but inconsistent application. |
Satisfactorily developed essay: demonstrates a general plan of organization. |
A well-developed essay, demonstrating a clear plan of organization. |
A well-developed essay, consistently demonstrating a logical and clear plan of organization. (Conclusion and Premises are clear and identifiable |
|
Accuracy
Weight 30.00% |
Lacks an analysis or evaluation of the issues beyond stating vague or inaccurate facts. |
Develops a faulty analysis or evaluation. (View expressed does not correspond to Philosopher chosen.) |
Demonstrates the ability to analyze and evaluate issues, from the philosophic view chosen, but not in depth. |
Demonstrates an ability to analyze, evaluate, and offer a resolution which is fundamentally consistent with the views of the philosopher chosen. |
Demonstrates an ability to expertly analyze, evaluate, and resolve a moral issue with a sound or cogent argument that is consistent with either Aristotle, Mill, or Kant. |