informatics

Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. More Help

  A-level Requirements B-level Requirements C-level Requirements D-level Requirements F-level

Overview 17.25 (15%) Provides a thorough overview explaining the purpose of both apps/devices and their most prominent features. The paper includes an analysis of the apps' or devices' interoperability with other systems and ethical use and protection of users' information.

13.8 (12%) Provides a somewhat thorough overview of the apps/devices and their prominent features, including interoperability, security, and protection of users' data.

12.08 (10.5%) Provides an overview of one app or a quick overview of both apps/devices without explaining enough for clear understanding.

10.35 (9%) Provides little introduction to the apps/devices.

0 (0%) Provides no overview or introduction to the apps/devices.

Strategy Identi�cation 34.5 (30%) Clearly identi�es at least two overarching strategies in each app that either motivates the user toward behavior change or motivates the user toward tracking/management of health. Clearly details how those strategies relate to speci�c behavior change theories. Theories are cited/referenced.

27.6 (24%) Clearly identi�es at least two overarching strategies in each app that either motivates the user toward behavior change or motivates the user toward tracking or management of health. Theories are cited/referenced.

24.15 (21%) Clearly identi�es at least two strategies for health management or behavior change, but does not tie them to particular behavior change theories.

20.7 (18%) Somewhat mentions at least one strategy for health management or behavior change, but does not mention existing behavior change theories.

0 (0%) Does not clearly identify two strategies for health management or behavior change and does not mention existing behavior change theories.

Comparing 17.25 (15%) At least two similarities between the two apps (regardless of whether they have the same or di�erent purposes) are identi�ed and well- discussed.

13.8 (12%) Two similarities between the two apps (regardless of whether they have the same or di�erent purposes) are identi�ed and are somewhat discussed.

12.08 (10.5%) Two similarities between the apps are identi�ed but are not well-discussed.

10.35 (9%) One similarity is discussed, OR similarities are brie�y mentioned without discussion.

0 (0%) No similarities are mentioned.

Contrasting 17.25 (15%) Two di�erences between the two apps' approaches are identi�ed, and the bene�ts or issues with each are addressed thoroughly.

13.8 (12%) Two di�erences between the two apps' approaches are identi�ed, and the bene�ts or issues with each are addressed somewhat.

12.08 (10.5%) Two di�erences between the two apps' approaches are identi�ed, but the bene�ts or issues with each are not addressed thoroughly.

10.35 (9%) One di�erence is discussed OR di�erences are brie�y mentioned without discussion.

0 (0%) No di�erences are mentioned.

Results 5.75 (5%) Student explains the results of using the apps for a week, the perceived e�ect on their personal wellness, the barriers they encountered, factors that in�uenced the change, and the student explains why the apps were or were not successful.

4.6 (4%) Student explains the results of their behavior change, shows a good understanding of the e�ects on their personal wellness, and somewhat explains the barriers and factors that in�uenced the change.

4.03 (3.5%) Student explains the results of their behavior change and brie�y mentions the e�ects on their wellness and barriers faced.

3.45 (3%) Student provides little result of the app/device.

0 (0%) No results provided.

Recommendations 11.5 (10%) There is at least one recommendation for the improvement of each app with reasoning as to why that recommendation was made.

9.2 (8%) There is at least one recommendation for the improvement of each app with little reasoning as to why that recommendation was made.

8.05 (7%) There is at least one recommendation for the improvement of each app without reasoning as to why that recommendation was made.

6.9 (6%) There is a recommendation for only one of the apps.

0 (0%) There are no recommendations.

Grammar & Writing Style 5.75 (5%) The paper is at least 3 full pages, using Times New Roman 12-point double-spaced text and follows the major conventions of grammar, spelling, and punctuation leading to a clear and understandable expression of ideas. It is a pleasure to read.

4.6 (4%) The paper is at least 3 full pages, using Times New Roman 12-point double-spaced text. There are very few errors, and the report reads easily and clearly.

4.03 (3.5%) An occasional error may cause the reader a moment of confusion, and the text does not meet all font, length, and spacing requirements.

3.45 (3%) Errors or shortcomings in grammar, spelling, and diction lead to confusion of ideas or the paper does not meet font or length requirements, but it is at least 1 full page.

0 (0%) The report is shorter than 1 full page.

Citing and References 5.75 (5%) Strong adherence to APA style.

4.6 (4%) Good use of APA style.

4.03 (3.5%) Several errors in APA style.

3.45 (3%) Many errors in APA style.

0 (0%) No use of APA OR no citing or references.

Name: App Report Rubric Exit

Grid View List View

Name:App Report Rubric Exit

24 X 7  B b  S up

po rt

24 X 7  B b  S up

po rt