TESTING AN INNOVATION'S FEASIBILITY PROJECT
|
Student: |
ENES 663 – Assignment 3 Rubric Innovation Feasibility Analysis
|
||
|
Criteria |
Exceeds expectations [grade range A to A-] |
Meets expectations [grade range B+ to B-] |
Below expectations [grade range C+ and below] |
|
Context of the Business: Is a business context provided for this analysis? |
Informative business description provided as context; clear relation to feasibility concerns. |
Basic description of business; limited connection made to feasibility concerns. |
None or very limited description of business context or feasibility concerns. |
|
Number and Relevance of Criteria Identified: How many feasibility criteria are identified? |
6 or more specific feasibility criteria identified; well-informed explanation of relevance provided. |
4-5 specific feasibility criteria identified; basic explanation of relevance provided. |
Fewer than 4 specific feasibility criteria identified; limited explanation of relevance provided. |
|
Criteria Description: Is each feasibility criterion fully described? |
Well-informed description; clear examples and explanation of each criterion |
Understandable description for each criterion; basic examples provided. |
None or very limited description for each criterion; no examples provided. |
|
Criteria Table: Are criteria clearly portrayed and measured? |
Well-organized format with informative narratives and % allocations; |
Clear format with basic narratives for each criterion; |
Unclear format or missing table; |
|
Writing Mechanics: Is the writing clear, logically constructed, and error-free? |
Clear, well-organized pattern with section headings; error-free writing; clear, understandable language; rich vocabulary |
Basic organizational pattern provided; mostly error-free writing; able to follow. |
Unclear organizational pattern; no section headings; presence of writing and/or grammar glitches; hard to follow. |
|
Research/Referencing: Are appropriate references used as supporting evidence? |
Supportive and clearly organized referencing provided; format clear.
|
Basic number of sources provided to support arguments made; format OK. |
None or limited references and supporting evidence provided; unclear format. |
|
Assignment Score = [15% of final grade] |