Mapping innovation roles project

profileonthehunt2
Rubric_663_MappingInnovationRoles.docx

Student:

ENES 663 – Assignment 2 Rubric

Innovation Role Mapping

Criteria

Exceeds expectations

[grade range A to A-]

Meets expectations

[grade range B+ to B-]

Below expectations

[grade range C+ and below]

Context of the Business: Is there a business described for these roles?

Clear, informative business description provided as context; clear relation to roles.

Basic description of business; limited connection made to innovation roles.

None or very limited description of business context.

Range of Roles Identified: How many and what types of innovation roles are identified?

More than 8 specific innovation roles identified; well-informed explanation provided.

8 specific innovation roles identified; basic, but understandable explanation provided.

Fewer than 8 specific innovation roles identified; limited explanation provided.

Role Description: How fully described is the innovation context for each role?

Clear description; informed examples and descriptive explanation of each role and its functionality

Understandable description for each role; good explanation of each role and its functionality

None or very limited description for each role; none or limited explanation of role functionality

Writing Mechanics: How clear, logically constructed, and error-free is the writing?

Clear, well-organized pattern with section headings; error-free writing; readily understandable language; rich vocabulary

Basic organizational pattern provided; mostly error-free writing; easy to follow.

Unclear organizational pattern; no section headings; presence of writing and/or grammar glitches; hard to follow.

Research/Referencing:

Are appropriate references used as supporting evidence?

Ample and clearly organized referencing provided.

Reasonable number of sources provided to support arguments made.

None or limited references and supporting evidence provided.

Assignment Score = points [15% of final grade]

TM: 2018